Theme

The thread: A smooth picture proves nothing — page 18

Page 18 of 20, continuing through the 172 essays this motif runs through.

172 essays carry this thread — page 18 of 20.

Every output of the air-data reduction, and how hard it leans on each reading. The logarithmic sensitivity of each derived quantity to each of the three readings — the total pressure, the static pressure and the indicated total temperature — at Mach 0.3 and Mach 0.85, at 11 km with a probe recovering 0.98: a one per cent error in a reading times the number is the per cent error it puts into the output. The Mach number leans on the two pressures by 8.08 and −8.08 at Mach 0.3 and by 1.13 and −1.13 at Mach 0.85, and not at all on the temperature. The static temperature leans on its probe by exactly one and on the pressures by −0.280 at Mach 0.3 and −0.281 at Mach 0.85 — almost the same. The true airspeed leans on the probe by exactly one half and the density by exactly minus one, at every speed. Compressible flow

Three readings, and the one each answer leans on

An aircraft works out the air it flies through from three readings — a static pressure, a total pressure and a probe's temperature — and every derived number inherits their errors through one small table of sensitivities. Written out, the table says the airspeed is afraid of the pressure sensors almost to Mach one at cruise altitude and only to Mach 0.52 at sea level, and that the density belongs to the thermometer at every speed.

A float under swell on a rotating planet goes round instead of away. The track of a float at the surface over 1 inertial periods (16.9 hours) after a 8 s swell of amplitude 1 m arrives at latitude 45°, in kilometres, the waves travelling to the right. Without friction the float runs round a circle of radius Uₛ/f = 0.479 km and comes back to where it started every 16.92 hours. With a drag on the Eulerian current it spirals out into a steady drift veered to the right: 24.3 per cent of the drift at 76.0° for a drag of 0.25 f; 70.7 per cent of the drift at 45.0° for a drag of 1 f; 94.9 per cent of the drift at 18.4° for a drag of 3 f. In a non-rotating ocean the same float would have gone 3.0 km straight on. Flows and fields

The drift a rotating planet takes back

In a wave tank the Stokes drift is cancelled by a return current because the tank has walls. The open ocean has none, and the drift is cancelled anyway: the Coriolis force acts on the water's real motion, drives an Eulerian current that answers it, and leaves the depth-integrated transport exactly zero at every viscosity. A float under steady swell with nothing to stop it goes round a circle instead of away.

The trailing sheet rolls up into two vortices, and nothing it carries is lost. The trailing vortex sheet behind an elliptically loaded wing, seen in a plane across the wake, at times 0, 0.05, 0.2, 0.6 in units of b²/Γ₀, represented by 160 point vortices with a smoothing length of 0.03 of the span. The tips curl up first and the sheet winds into two concentrated vortices while the whole system sinks under its own induced velocity; by t = 0.6 the pair's centroid has descended 0.122 of the span. Through all of it the crossflow energy — the induced drag — and the separation of the two halves' centroids, 0.7854 of the span, stay exactly what they were. What is taught wrongly

The drag a wake keeps however it rolls up

A plane drawn across the wake of a finite wing contains its induced drag as the kinetic energy of the swirling crossflow. The trailing sheet then rolls up into two vortices, and the energy does not change at all — roll-up moves the drag around the plane without spending any of it. What does spend it is viscosity, which turns crossflow energy into a total-pressure defect, so a plane farther back reads less induced drag, more profile drag, and the same total.

A vortex sheet rolling up, at five stages. One period of an initially flat vortex sheet with a small perturbation on it, drawn at equal intervals. The perturbation grows, the sheet steepens, and the ends wind into a spiral. Nothing is added to the sheet after the first instant. Ideal flow

A spiral is a legible record

When a vortex sheet rolls up, the fluid in it can never change places: two points on a sheet cannot pass one another. So the arms of the spiral are a map of the initial sheet, in order, and the picture is a record of the roll-up rather than a snapshot of it.

What is left behind, and what it is made of. The two rolled-up vortices behind a large aircraft, drawn to scale against its span. They sit at 78.5 per cent of the span apart, each carries 508 square metres a second of circulation, and the pair descends at 1.72 metres a second under its own induction. Circulation and lift

A wake that says what made it

Two vortices sitting behind an aeroplane carry its weight and its span in a form that can be read back out: circulation times separation times density times speed is the lift, exactly. The reading is exact for about a minute and worth nothing after four.

How fast a duct forgets each part of its inlet. The decay rate along the duct for each mode of a disturbance to the developed profile. It goes as the square of the mode number, so the third mode is forgotten nine times faster than the first and the tenth a hundred times faster. Viscosity

A duct that forgets everything but one number

Whatever is fed into a pipe, what survives a little way down it is one shape. The disturbance's higher modes decay as the square of their mode number, so the sixth is gone in thirteen centimetres where the first survives four and a half metres — and the entrance length is that one mode's decay rate and an arbitrary threshold.

There and back again. A blob of a hundred and twenty tracer particles at the start, after four time units of stirring, and after the same four run backwards. The third set is drawn over the first and the worst particle is 1.4·10⁻⁹ from where it began. Ideal flow

Reversible, and unusable

Ideal flow has no arrow of time in it. Run a stirring backwards and the dye comes back — here to 1.4 parts in a thousand million. Nudge the state by a hundred-millionth first and the same reversal returns a blob almost five hundred times further from home than the nudge was large.

Below Mach 1.153 the boom turns back before it reaches the ground. The ray leaving the Mach cone straight down from an aeroplane at 11 km, at Mach 1.1, 1.15, 1.2, 1.5, 2, traced through a standard atmosphere whose sound speed rises from 295.1 m/s at the aeroplane to 340.3 m/s at the ground. A ray bends back upward where the local sound speed equals the aeroplane's speed, so Mach 1.1: turns at 4.00 km; Mach 1.15: turns at 0.25 km; Mach 1.2: lands 24.0 km on; Mach 1.5: lands 11.4 km on; Mach 2: lands 7.1 km on. The dividing speed, Mach 1.1533, is the ratio of the two sound speeds. Compressible flow

The boom that turns back before the ground

Sound is faster in the warm air near the ground, so a sonic boom's rays bend back upward on the way down. Whether any of them arrive is one comparison — the aeroplane's speed against the fastest sound beneath it — and the ray that just grazes the ground sets the edge of the carpet, which the uniform air of the ageing calculation cannot give it.

In the frame of the wave the walls stand still, and a bolus rides between them. Streamlines of a peristaltic channel of amplitude ratio 0.7 over two wavelengths, drawn in the frame moving with the wave, where the flow is steady and the walls are themselves streamlines. The time-mean flow is Θ = 0.5904 of the wave speed times the mean half-width, so the flow rate between centreline and wall in this frame is q = −0.4096 and the pressure rise per wavelength is 0.000 in units of μcλ/a². The centreline velocity changes sign at 0.106π and 0.894π, and the streamline through those points closes round a bolus holding 30.5 per cent of the fluid in each wavelength, which travels with the wave. Flows and fields

A wave on the wall is a pump

A channel whose wall only moves in and out, in a wave travelling along it, delivers a steady net flow with no part of the wall moving along the channel. In the frame of the wave the walls stand still and are streamlines, so continuity alone fixes how the laboratory flow rate follows the wall shape — and the momentum equation is needed only for one number, which also decides whether fluid rides along with the wave or leaks back against it.

All themes