The thread: A smooth picture proves nothing — page 33
309 essays carry this thread — page 33 of 35.
A wand that lags its sea makes flying level the better bet
A foiling dinghy whose height control divides the sea sharply follows the long waves, flies level through the short and beats both pure strategies. Give the division the lag a real wand or filter has and the gain disappears in a moderate sea; in a rough one no crossover both keeps the foil under and spares it from pulling down. A second-order filter, which cuts more sharply, does worse rather than better, because it flies through more of the sea near its crossover than the sea contains.
Plating that gives way slows the water that slams it, but only on a flat bottom
The slamming pressure on a hull's bottom is a ridge that rides at the edge of the wetted width, and how fast that edge moves depends on how far the water has to climb. A panel of plating that bends inward under the load gives the water further to climb, and while it is moving away it slows the climb itself. Fed back into Wagner's condition, that takes a seventh off the peak stress of a panel on a four-degree bottom loaded to the edge of what aluminium can bear, and almost nothing on a deep V — because what matters is the plating's deflection against the bottom's own rise across the panel.
A wire sings with the force on it, not the flow round it
A free flow can only radiate as a quadrupole, four sources nearly cancelling, which is why a jet's noise grows as the eighth power of its speed and so little of its power becomes sound. Put a body in the flow and the cancellation is broken: the fluctuating force the body exerts is a dipole, its sound grows as the sixth power, and at the speed of any wind it outshouts the turbulence that made it by a factor of tens of thousands. The whistle of a wire is the force of its own wake, radiated.
A trip deeper than the film's window flips the bearing twice a cycle
A smooth derating acts on a bearing's housing temperature as it stands. Most real protections trip instead: they cut the motor at one temperature and restore it at a lower one, a hysteresis of their own laid on top of the film's. Whether the oil then jumps between its cool and hot states is decided by one comparison — the cut's depth against the width of the film's window — and past it the protection's own band sets the rhythm. A trip never lowers the film's peak at all; it only protects the housing, and a deep one buys that with a plunge to the cool branch twice in every cycle.
An edge no observer can move still depends on what it is averaged against
The Q-criterion puts a co-rotating vortex pair in four per cent of a window for one observer and in more than half of it for another. The cure is to average, along each fluid path, how far the vorticity departs from its mean — a number no observer's rotation can change — and take the outermost convex level of it round each core. Computed, it works: both observers find two discs of radius 1.00, twice the core radius, and no fluid inside them strays from its core in an orbit. But the edge has a setting of its own. The mean must be taken over some region, and as that region grows from a radius of 4 to 20 the edge moves from 0.90 to 1.13.
Thickness carries no load of its own and still moves the load forward
Thin-aerofoil theory builds a section's pressures from three pieces computed apart — its thickness, its camber, its incidence — and adds them. Every piece can be computed exactly on a Joukowski section, and so can the section they add up to. Added, the parts give a suction peak a quarter too weak and a loading that sits too far aft, and they miss nine per cent of the lift: thickness, which lifts nothing by itself, multiplies what camber and incidence make by 1 + 0.77 t/c. Carry the summed velocities through Bernoulli instead of adding the pressures, and most of the error goes; the part that stays is the cross term between thickness and lift, and it is first order in the lift.
A thinning gas flows least at one free path across, and then more without end
Pump the gas out of a narrow channel and, for the same pressure gradient, less of it flows — until the channel is about one mean free path high. Thinner than that, more flows, and between infinite plates the flow rate climbs without limit, because the molecules carrying it are the ones skimming along the walls, whose flights only collisions with other molecules can end. Knudsen measured the minimum in 1909. The linearised kinetic equation puts it at a reduced flow rate of 1.538, at a Knudsen number of 0.83, and shows it is not a dip below the two closed forms but a place far above both.
A step's face is pushed at its foot and pulled at its lip, equally
Ideal flow running up a step has two corners in it, and the local theory of corners says what each does: the inside corner at the foot brings the flow to rest, the outside corner at the lip sends it round at infinite speed. Solved exactly, the step's face feels both — a push of 2/π of a dynamic pressure times its height spread over its lower four-fifths, and a pull concentrated at the lip — and they cancel exactly, at every ramp angle, because one reflection of the mapping exchanges the two corners. A step has no drag in ideal flow for the same reason a flat plate's lift has no drag: a finite force carried by an infinite speed.
A mica sheet hides its glue only at the smallest gaps, and changes how the false slip falls
A drainage measurement against a soft wall reads a slip that is not there, falling as the square of the gap. The wall in a surface-force apparatus is not a soft half-space but a stiff mica sheet on a soft glue, and the sheet spreads the drainage pressure over its own bending length before the glue feels it. Where the pressed region is wider than that length the sheet changes nothing; where it is narrower the sheet sinks as one piece, a spring in series with the liquid. That cuts the false slip only by the square of the bending length over the pressed width — threefold at three nanometres for three micrometres of mica — and it turns the slip's fall with the gap from the inverse square towards the inverse, which is the test an experimenter would have used to see it.