Theme

The thread: A smooth picture proves nothing — page 9

Page 9 of 20, continuing through the 172 essays this motif runs through.

172 essays carry this thread — page 9 of 20.

One streamline, sectioned, in two steady flows. Every time a single streamline crosses the plane z ≡ 0 going upwards, a point is plotted. On the left the flow is integrable and the points lie on a curve, however long the trajectory is run. On the right one coefficient of the same exact solution has been changed and the same single streamline scatters over a sixth of the plane. Both flows are steady, both are incompressible to machine precision, and both are exact solutions of the Euler equations.

Steady, three-dimensional, and mixing anyway

A steady flow that solves the Euler equations exactly, with its vorticity equal to its velocity to six parts in ten thousand million — and one of its streamlines wanders through a sixth of the box while another, started nearby, lies on a curve for ever.

Twice as fast is not twice as thick. The film a plate carries out of water, against the speed it is withdrawn at, both logarithmic. The slope is exactly two-thirds, so doubling the speed thickens the film by 58.7 per cent and never by more. The open marks are outside the range the derivation holds in — above a capillary number of about a hundredth the film is no longer thin against the capillary length, and the measured thickness leaves this line.

Viscosity

What a plate takes with it

Pull a plate out of a bath and it comes out wet. How wet is not set by the plate, the bath or how much liquid there is, but by a competition in a region a fraction of a millimetre long that nobody looking at the plate can see — and the film goes as the two-thirds power of the speed, never as the first.

Two exact solutions of the same problem. Two steady Euler flows in the same square cell with the same boundary condition, differing only in the function relating vorticity to streamfunction. On the left the vorticity is proportional to the streamfunction, which is the textbook cellular flow; on the right it is uniform. Both satisfy the equations exactly. Nothing in the ideal theory prefers either, and at the same peak streamfunction their kinetic energies differ by thirty-one per cent.

Ideal flow

The vorticity nothing decides

A streamline that comes from upstream carries its vorticity with it. A closed one comes from nowhere, so nothing determines what it carries — the ambiguity is not one number per body but a whole function. What closes it is a limit, and setting the viscosity to zero gives a different answer from letting it go to zero.

One signature, aged four times. The pressure signature of a slender body at four distances, computed by the exact Lax formula for the nonlinear propagation. Each point of the waveform moves forward in proportion to its own overpressure, so the compression at the front catches the undisturbed air and a shock forms there, while the expansion at the rear falls behind and forms a second one. What is left is an N-wave: two discontinuities and a straight line between them, spreading and weakening.

Compressible flow

The signature that forgets the shape

The pressure field near a supersonic aeroplane depends on every part of it. What reaches the ground has two parameters. Two bodies whose near-field signatures differ by fifty-five per cent in peak and by their whole shape age into the same N-wave, to two and a half per cent.

A double integral that comes out an integer. The Gauss linking integral evaluated on six pairs of closed curves. It is not constrained to be a whole number by anything in its own definition — it is a double integral of a smooth kernel — and it returns one to within two parts in ten thousand on two hundred points per curve, because what it is computing is a topological count.

Flows and fields

The knot a flow cannot untie

Ideal flow conserves energy, circulation and impulse, and all three are what they look like. It conserves a fourth quantity that is not: a volume integral of the velocity dotted into the vorticity, whose value counts how many times the vortex lines are linked through one another.

Seven fluids in one pipe at one pressure gradient. Velocity profiles of power-law fluids in a round pipe, all at the same pressure gradient and the same consistency, scaled to the fastest. A shear-thinning fluid (n below one) is flatter in the middle and steeper at the wall; a shear-thickening one is the reverse. The flattening is often called plug-like, which invites the reading that the fluid is moving more freely — what has actually happened is that all the shear has been pushed into a thin annulus at the wall, which is the expensive place to put it.

Viscosity

A viscosity that depends on the question

Blood, paint, molten polymer and drilling mud have no viscosity. They have a relation between stress and strain rate that is not proportional, so the ratio of the two depends on how hard they are being sheared — and an instrument that reports one number is reporting a property of itself.

The same flow, from two different physics. Solid lines: the depth-averaged flow between two plates a small distance apart, with an obstacle standing between them. Dashed: the ideal-flow solution for the same obstacle. They are the same field to a part in ten billion, because averaging Stokes flow across a narrow gap gives a velocity that is the gradient of a harmonic potential. The cell has no inertia at all, which is the one hypothesis the ideal theory cannot do without.

Ideal flow

The exact theory, drawn by viscosity

Two flat plates a millimetre apart, syrup between them, an obstacle in the gap. The Reynolds number is a hundredth, inertia is absent, and the streamline pattern is the potential flow past that obstacle — exactly, to a part in ten billion. The one hypothesis ideal flow cannot do without is the one this flow most conspicuously breaks.

$One rate per moment, and none of them the same. lambda_p = ln<l^p>/(p t) against p. As p goes to zero it is the Lyapunov exponent, the rate of the typical element; at p = 1 it is the rate of the average length, which is nearly twice as large. If ln l were exactly Gaussian this would be a straight line with the Lyapunov exponent as its intercept, and the departure from that line is the same multifractality the velocity increments have.$ Flows and fields

The stretching rate that is not one number

A material line in a flow gets longer, and there is a theorem saying its length grows at a definite exponential rate. There is also a rate at which the average length grows, and it is nearly twice as large — and a different rate for every moment of the distribution.

The wall is a boundary condition, solved for rather than reflected. A model's trailing vortices in a closed working section, with the sheet of sources that makes the wall a wall drawn as a displacement of the wall itself. The interference is an upwash — the model looks better than it is, and the correction factor comes to 0.1242 against the exact value 0.1250 that the image at the inverse point gives for a circle. The arrows are the interference velocity alone, with the model's own downwash removed, drawn to a common scale set by the longest of them.

Circulation and lift

The walls are in the answer

A wind tunnel measures a wing in a box the aeroplane will never fly in, and the box is worth a fifteenth of the induced drag. The correction is exactly an eighth for a closed circular section and exactly minus an eighth for an open jet, and the sign is the whole argument.

All themes