Concept

The Borda–Carnot loss — where it appears

The loss of total pressure at a sudden expansion, equal to the dynamic pressure of the velocity difference. It is an exact result from the momentum theorem with no empirical constant, and it is the archetype of a loss that has no viscosity in it.

Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The same reading, and only one of them gives it back. A Venturi and an orifice plate at the same diameter ratio, with the pressure along the axis drawn beneath each. Both narrow the flow by the same amount, both read the same difference between the pipe and the narrowest section, and both infer the same flow rate from it. Downstream they part company: the Venturi's diffuser turns the throat's speed back into pressure, and the orifice's jet expands into the pipe and destroys 73% of the reading. The picture is a section rather than a solved field: nothing here computes the jet, and the recirculating corner is not drawn.

The price of knowing the flow rate

Two flowmeters can narrow a pipe by the same amount, read the same pressure difference and infer the same flow rate, and cost pressures that differ by an order of magnitude. What separates them is not viscosity, and not workmanship — it is whether the flow is decelerated or abandoned.

applied · Metering

A pump curve out of the momentum theorem. The pressure an ejector delivers, against how much it is entraining, at a fixed nozzle. It has the shape of every pump characteristic ever measured — a shut-off pressure with no flow, falling to no pressure at free delivery — and it was obtained from a momentum balance on a tube with nothing in it. The shut-off value here is 36.0 kPa and the machine at its best power runs at 4.56 times its own motive flow.

Mixing is a pump

Two streams at different speeds mixing in a tube destroy energy — the same Borda–Carnot expression a handbook prints beside a sudden enlargement, with two streams in it instead of one. And while they destroy it the pressure rises, which makes the loss the mechanism of a machine with no moving parts.

applied · Ejector

Six nozzles, six pump curves, and where each one is best. The head ratio a water jet pump delivers against the flow ratio it entrains, for six area ratios from a narrow nozzle to one filling four-fifths of the throat. A wide nozzle makes a tall, steep curve that is finished at a small flow; a narrow one makes a low, long curve. The dots are each curve's best-efficiency point. Nozzle, suction, throat-friction and diffuser losses are included at borrowed representative values, and the mixing loss is computed.

The nozzle that is best at one thing

Put the four losses back into a jet pump and three questions get three answers. The most head comes from a nozzle four-fifths of its throat, in closed form; the best efficiency from one a quarter of it; and the most flow from whichever nozzle is smallest, because flow has no optimum at all.

applied · Ejector $At the cheapest fork each daughter runs at the parent's velocity along it, so the split loses only the sideways part. The power lost at a symmetric split, as a multiple of the flow times the parent's dynamic pressure, against the daughters' radius as a fraction of the parent's, at each of three cheapest angles. For laminar, k = 3 the angle is 37.5°, the curve's minimum is at a ratio of 0.7937 — the cheapest ratio — and its value is sin²θ = 0.37; for smooth turbulent, 27/11 the angle is 28.4°, the curve's minimum is at a ratio of 0.754 — the cheapest ratio — and its value is sin²θ = 0.226; for rough, 7/3 the angle is 25.1°, the curve's minimum is at a ratio of 0.743 — the cheapest ratio — and its value is sin²θ = 0.18.$

The cheapest fork loses only its sideways speed, and pricing it closes the fork

A turbulent network built at least cost forks at 28.4°, with daughters three quarters of the parent's radius, and those numbers priced the pipes and never the split. Price the split as Borda priced a sudden widening and something exact appears: at the cheapest fork each daughter already runs at the parent's velocity component along it, so the junction loses nothing but the sideways part of the parent's speed, and its loss cannot be reduced by resizing the daughters. It can be reduced by narrowing the fork. A split costing under two per cent of the bill moves the cheapest angle by seven degrees, because the pipes' bill is flat at its best angle and the split's loss is not.

applied · Branching

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Optimisation Pressure recovery Control volume Efficiency Ejector Entrainment Mixing loss Momentum flux Bernoulli's equation Contraction coefficient Diffuser Discharge coefficient

All concepts