Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

The law of the wall — where it appears

The logarithmic velocity profile in the overlap region of a turbulent wall layer. Its form follows from there being no length scale available in that region, and its constant has been measured for ninety years and derived from nothing.

Named by 7 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

u⁺ = (1/κ) ln y⁺ + B, integrated rather than assumed. The velocity profile in wall units, produced by integrating the mixing-length closure outward from the wall. The straight portion is the log law and the constants beside it were least-squares fitted to the integrated curve over 50 < y⁺ < 500 — so the 1/κ is a measurement on the drawing rather than the number that was fed in. The viscous sublayer u⁺ = y⁺ comes out rather than being pasted on.

A guess with a constant in it

Prandtl's mixing length is one line — an eddy near a wall can only be as big as its distance from the wall. Integrate it and the whole structure of a turbulent wall profile falls out, sublayer and log region and all. That is a fact about the assumption, and the essay is careful about which.

turbulence · Closure The plateau that is the log law. y⁺ du⁺/dy⁺ across a channel, at five Reynolds numbers. Millikan's argument says this quantity must be constant wherever neither the viscous length nor the channel width may appear, and its value there is 1/κ. At Re_τ = 180 there is no flat part at all; at Re_τ = 100,000 it is flat over 2.16 decades and gives κ = 0.4120. The log law is a statement about a limit, and this is the picture of the flow approaching it.

The layer with no length in it

The logarithm in a turbulent wall profile does not come from any model of turbulence. It comes from a region where neither of the flow's two lengths is allowed to appear, and where a velocity gradient therefore has nothing to depend on but the distance to the wall. The constant in it has never been derived from anything.

turbulence · Wall law Where the first grid point may go. The error in the friction a wall treatment infers, against the height of the first grid point, at Re_τ = 20,000. The velocity fed to each treatment is the closure's own, so what is plotted is the modelling of the boundary condition with nothing else in it. The log-law function is exact between y⁺ 30 and 10261 and is 64 per cent wrong at y⁺ = 1; the sublayer treatment is exact below y⁺ = 5 and hopeless above it; and the blend that most codes ship is within a few per cent everywhere and exact nowhere.

What a code says to a wall

A calculation that cannot afford to resolve the viscous sublayer has to tell the wall something else instead, and what it tells it is the law of the wall — an asymptotic result, applied at one grid point, on the assumption that the point lies in a region the calculation has not checked exists. Where it does, the answer is exact. Where it does not, the friction is out by tens of per cent, and refining the grid makes it worse.

turbulence · Wall law The roughness function, and the asymptote in which the viscosity has gone. The whole effect of a rough wall on a turbulent boundary layer is one number: the downward shift of the logarithmic profile. It vanishes on a smooth wall, rises through a transitional band, and becomes (1/kappa)ln(k+) + B − 8.5 — at which point substituting it back leaves u+ = (1/kappa)ln(y/k) + 8.5, with the fluid's own length gone from the answer entirely.

A second length at the wall

The logarithm in a turbulent wall profile exists because a region of the flow is not allowed to know about any length except the distance to the wall. Roughen the surface and there is one it does know about, which belongs neither to the fluid nor to the flow — and the slope does not change at all.

turbulence · Roughness Four wall models, through the buffer layer. Van Driest's damped mixing length, Reichardt's fit, Spalding's implicit law, and a control with no buffer layer at all — the viscous sublayer joined straight to the logarithm where they cross, at y+ = 11.6. The three fitted models agree with each other to a per cent and a half; the control is nineteen per cent above them at y+ = 10.

Three buffer layers, one friction

Four wall models are put through a pipe. The one with no buffer layer at all is nineteen per cent wrong where the turbulence production peaks and two and a half per cent wrong in the friction; the three respectable ones are within two per cent of each other in the buffer layer and spread by seven in the friction. The answer is not where it was expected.

turbulence · Wall law Above the logarithm the profile lifts away: the wake. The mean velocity in wall units against the distance from the wall, for a flat-plate layer at Reθ = 10⁴ (δ⁺ = 3484), from Spalding's inner law alone and with Coles's wake of strength Π = 0.3, 0.55 and 1. Below about a fifth of the layer the curves coincide on the logarithm; above it the wake lifts the profile by up to 2Π/κ, 2.68 wall units for a flat plate — a tenth of the edge velocity, and the part of the profile a log law cannot describe.

The wake is a tenth of the velocity and a third of the displacement

The logarithmic law describes a band in the middle of a turbulent boundary layer, and above it the profile lifts away by an amount Coles called the wake. It is a tenth of the edge velocity, so it looks like a correction. It is not: it carries a third of the layer's displacement, it is what turns the log law into a friction law for a boundary layer, and with it the friction comes out within a few per cent of a measured correlation that contains no logarithm at all.

turbulence · Wall law An adverse gradient hollows the layer from the outside in. The velocity profile of an equilibrium layer, as a fraction of the edge velocity against y/δ, at Clauser's β = 0, 2, 10 and 50, with the wake strength from Das's fit. The inner part keeps the wall law; the outer part's wake grows — Π = 0.476, 1.59, 4.67 and 15.2 — and the profile sags until most of the layer is moving slowly over a thin fast wall region.

An adverse gradient grows the wake, not the log law

Push a turbulent boundary layer up a rising pressure and its profile changes from the outside in. The wall region keeps its law; the wake grows, the layer hollows, the shape factor climbs and the friction falls. Clauser found the layers that stay similar while this happens, and their arithmetic has a surprise in it: there is a steepest pressure rise any such layer can climb, close to a free stream falling as the inverse fourth root of the distance, and the friction approaches zero only as the layer becomes all wake.

turbulence · Wall law

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Boundary layerThe von Kármán constantFriction velocityOverlap layerSkin frictionWall unitsClosureMixing lengthModel limitViscous sublayerAdverse pressure gradientEddy viscosity

All concepts