Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

The von Kármán constant — where it appears

The coefficient in the logarithmic law of the wall, near 0.41 and measured rather than derived. Its published values differ by more than their stated uncertainties, largely because a constant defined in a limit is being fitted at finite Reynolds number.

Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

u⁺ = (1/κ) ln y⁺ + B, integrated rather than asserted. The velocity profile in wall units, produced by integrating the mixing-length closure outward from the wall. The straight portion is the log law and the constants beside it were least-squares fitted to the integrated curve over 50 < y⁺ < 500 — so the 1/κ is a measurement on the drawing rather than the number that was fed in. The viscous sublayer u⁺ = y⁺ comes out rather than being pasted on.

A guess with a constant in it

Prandtl's mixing length is one line — an eddy near a wall can only be as big as its distance from the wall. Integrate it and the whole structure of a turbulent wall profile falls out, sublayer and log region and all. That is a fact about the assumption, and the essay is careful about which.

turbulence · Closure The plateau that is the log law. y⁺ du⁺/dy⁺ across a channel, at five Reynolds numbers. Millikan's argument says this quantity must be constant wherever neither the viscous length nor the channel width may appear, and its value there is 1/κ. At Re_τ = 180 there is no flat part at all; at Re_τ = 100,000 it is flat over 2.16 decades and gives κ = 0.4120. The log law is a statement about a limit, and this is the picture of the flow approaching it.

The layer with no length in it

The logarithm in a turbulent wall profile does not come from any model of turbulence. It comes from a region where neither of the flow's two lengths is allowed to appear, and where a velocity gradient therefore has nothing to depend on but the distance to the wall. The constant in it has never been derived from anything.

turbulence · Wall law The roughness function, and the asymptote in which the viscosity has gone. The whole effect of a rough wall on a turbulent boundary layer is one number: the downward shift of the logarithmic profile. It vanishes on a smooth wall, rises through a transitional band, and becomes (1/kappa)ln(k+) + B − 8.5 — at which point substituting it back leaves u+ = (1/kappa)ln(y/k) + 8.5, with the fluid's own length gone from the answer entirely.

A second length at the wall

The logarithm in a turbulent wall profile exists because a region of the flow is not allowed to know about any length except the distance to the wall. Roughen the surface and there is one it does know about, which belongs neither to the fluid nor to the flow — and the slope does not change at all.

turbulence · Roughness Four wall models, through the buffer layer. Van Driest's damped mixing length, Reichardt's fit, Spalding's implicit law, and a control with no buffer layer at all — the viscous sublayer joined straight to the logarithm where they cross, at y+ = 11.6. The three fitted models agree with each other to a per cent and a half; the control is nineteen per cent above them at y+ = 10.

Three buffer layers, one friction

Four wall models are put through a pipe. The one with no buffer layer at all is nineteen per cent wrong where the turbulence production peaks and two and a half per cent wrong in the friction; the three respectable ones are within two per cent of each other in the buffer layer and spread by seven in the friction. The answer is not where it was expected.

turbulence · Wall law

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

The law of the wallFriction velocityMixing lengthViscous sublayerWall unitsBoundary layerClosureEddy viscosityOverlap layerSimilaritySkin frictionClosure problem

All concepts