Concept

Munk's stagger theorem — where it appears

The result that the induced drag of a lifting system does not change when its elements are moved along the flow direction. It is why a biplane's drag depends on gap and not on stagger, and it follows from the drag being an integral in the wake alone.

Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The wake, and the velocity it gives itself. The cross-section of the wake far behind a wing with turned-up tips, with the velocity the wake induces on itself drawn as arrows normal to the trace. Induced drag is the integral of the circulation against that velocity and nothing else — this picture contains the entire quantity. It also contains no information whatever about where the surfaces were: two wings a chord apart and two wings ten chords apart produce the same picture and therefore the same drag, which is Munk's stagger theorem stated as a fact about what the arithmetic can see.

A wing that leaves the plane

A winglet is not a fence and it does not block anything escaping round the tip. The induced drag of any system of lifting surfaces depends on one cross-section of its wake and on nothing else whatever, and a wake that reaches upwards is cheaper for the same reason a wake that reaches sideways is.

circulation · Winglet

Four aeroplanes, one number. Four biplanes with the same gap and the same loadings, staggered by nothing, by four tenths, by nine tenths and by one and six tenths of a chord. Their induced drags agree to the last bit of the arithmetic — the calculation cannot even express the stagger, because the Trefftz plane is a cross-section and everything drawn here projects onto the same one. That is Munk's stagger theorem, and stating it as the drag is unchanged understates it: there is no place in the computation where the stagger could be entered.

Two wings and it does not matter where

Move one wing of a biplane a chord forward and the induced drag does not change. Not approximately, not to a good approximation — the calculation that gives the induced drag has nowhere to put the stagger, because everything projects onto the same cross-section of the wake.

circulation · Biplane $Tip to tip, two wings cost exactly half of what they cost apart. The induced-drag saving of a pair of wings against the gap between their tips, as a fraction of what the two pay flying alone. With the tips touching the pair is one wing of twice the span carrying twice the lift, and the arithmetic of that is exact: the drag halves, and the computation returns 0.499257 of the separate figure. Pull them apart and the saving falls away with the square of the distance. Birds fly in a V because the tips are the part worth overlapping, and the spacing that pays is a small fraction of a span rather than any distance a formation could hold by eye.$

The lift beside a wing

Fly two aeroplanes with their wingtips touching and the pair costs exactly half what the two cost apart. Not approximately half — the arithmetic is a closed form, because two wings tip to tip are one wing of twice the span, and induced drag goes as the square of it.

circulation · Formation $What every wing pays to bend its root less. Least induced drag against the root bending moment of the lift, both as fractions of the elliptic monoplane of the same span and lift, for the monoplane and for box wings with gaps of a tenth, a fifth and two-fifths of the span. Each curve is a parabola with its minimum at that wing's unconstrained optimum. The box wings' minima sit to the right of the monoplane's — they load their lift further out — and their parabolas are shallower: the gap-of-a-fifth box can bend its root 21 per cent less than the elliptic monoplane and still match its drag.$

A lighter spar turns a box wing into a biplane

Prandtl's best wing system has two-thirds of a monoplane's induced drag at a gap of a fifth of the span, and part of that saving is carried by circulation turning the corner into its fins. Ask the box to bend its root less and it pays about half what a monoplane pays — but a biplane with no fins pays nearly as little, and by the time the spar is a fifth lighter the fins carry almost nothing and the box has become the biplane it was built from.

circulation · Box wing $A V seen from above, and what each member pays. Nine wings in a V swept 45 degrees, tips one span apart, each carrying the same lift, seen from above with the flight direction up the page. Beside each is its induced drag as a fraction of what it would pay flying alone. The leader at the point pays 0.89; every other member pays between 0.35 and 0.39. The saving has flowed backwards through the formation.$

The bird at the point pays for the V

A flock's saving in a V is fixed by where its members sit across the stream, and the angle of the V cannot change it by a single per cent. What the angle changes is who gets the saving. It flows backwards through the formation, so that in a V swept forty-five degrees the leader pays nine-tenths of what it would pay alone while every bird behind it pays under four-tenths.

circulation · Formation

A fair V is a curved V

In a straight V of birds somebody always pays more than somebody else: at the fairest angle the leader and the two birds at the tips pay half again what the birds between them pay. The V in which every bird pays exactly the same can be solved for, and it is not straight. Its arms leave the leader almost abreast and bend back ever more steeply, to thirty-two degrees at the tips of a flock of nine. The share every bird then pays is the flock's average, fixed by Munk's theorem before any position is chosen — so fairness costs nothing, and the only thing that can make the flock cheaper is flying closer together sideways.

circulation · Formation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Induced drag Model limit Span loading The Trefftz plane Optimisation Non-planar wake Circulation Formation Superposition Bending moment Constraint Downwash

All concepts