Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Shock structure — where it appears

The internal profile of a shock, about which the jump conditions say nothing. It is set entirely by viscosity and conduction, and above about Mach three it is thinner than a mean free path — a structure the continuum equations that drew it cannot support.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

γ for air, against temperature. The ratio of specific heats for air as a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen, with the vibrational mode filling according to the Einstein function. It is 1.400 at room temperature, where only translation and rotation are available; 1.337 at a thousand kelvin; and 1.288 at six thousand. Every compressible result on this site has used 1.4, and that is the value for a gas that is not hot — which, behind any shock worth drawing, it is not.

When gamma stops being a number

Every compressible result on this site has used γ = 1.4, which counts the ways a nitrogen molecule can hold energy at room temperature. Behind a Mach 10 shock the gas is at 3,800 kelvin and the count is different — and the pressure barely moves while the temperature falls by fifteen per cent.

compressible · Real gas The velocity through a shock at Mach two, as a function of position. The Becker profile, integrated outwards from its own inflection point. It runs from the upstream velocity to the downstream one — the two states the jump conditions give, which appear here as the equilibria of a first-order differential equation — and its steepest gradient matches the closed form to one part in ten thousand. The horizontal axis is in units of the thickness, which for this shock is 139 nanometres.

The discontinuity that has a thickness

The jump conditions do not contain the viscosity, which is why they are exact. The thickness is entirely viscosity — 289 nanometres at Mach 1.5, 35 at Mach 5, against a mean free path of 64. At Mach five the continuum equations have produced a structure thinner than the distance between collisions.

compressible · Shock The coefficient Stokes threw away is not a correction. What absorbs sound in dry air, split into the three transport effects that add to make the diffusivity of sound. Shear viscosity is the largest single contribution and it is not most of it; the bulk viscosity — which Stokes set to zero in 1845, saying in the same paper that he had no argument for doing so — is a quarter, and thermal conduction is a fifth. Setting ζ to zero does not make a small error in the absorption; it makes a 24 per cent one.

The viscosity nobody uses

A fluid has two viscosities. One resists a change of shape and appears in every figure on this site; the other resists a change of volume, was set to zero by Stokes in 1845 in a paper that says he had no argument for doing so, and for carbon dioxide is fifteen hundred times larger than the one everybody quotes.

viscous · Bulk viscosity Seven shock structures, and the two states they all connect. The velocity through the shock for seven dissipation models — Prandtl numbers from a quarter to two, viscosities from constant to linear in temperature. Each curve is shifted so its midpoint sits at the origin. They start at the same speed, end at the same speed, and are nothing alike in between.

The jump does not ask what made it

Seven different dissipation mechanisms are made to smear the same shock. Their interiors are a factor of two and a third apart in thickness, their entropies overshoot the final value by between a quarter and a doubling, and the state they all arrive at agrees to seven parts in ten billion — because the end states are conservation and the interior is transport.

compressible · Shock

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

EntropyDissipationNormal shockDiscontinuityIrreversibilityModel limitPrandtl numberViscosityBulk viscosityCompressibilityConservationContinuum

All concepts