Sweep — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The wind a swept wing feels
Sweeping a wing back is usually justified by saying it meets a slower wind. It does not meet a slower wind. The equations split exactly in two, and the flow along the span is a passenger that exerts no force and changes nothing — until a pressure gradient breaks the split, and then it becomes the reason a swept wing is a different problem rather than a harder one.
The sweep a root does not have
Simple sweep theory is one of the cleanest arguments in aerodynamics: an infinite yawed wing cannot know about the velocity along its own span, so only the normal component matters. A real wing has a root and two tips, and at the root of a thirty-five-degree wing the isobars are swept fourteen.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Critical machModel limitThe Biot–Savart lawBlasiusBoundary layerCrossflowFalkner–SkanIndependence principleInterferenceLift coefficientLifting linePanel method