Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Interference — where it appears

The change in the forces on one body caused by the presence of another. It is computed from the flow each induces at the other, and for lifting systems it depends on their separation across the stream and not along it.

Named by 14 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A slotted flap at 30°, in a flow with no viscosity anywhere. Streamlines through a main element and a flap, computed by a two-body panel solve. Each element carries its own circulation and its own Kutta condition, and the two interfere through their velocity fields and through nothing else — there is no boundary layer here, no wake, no mixing region and no high-energy air. The system's lift coefficient is 2.757 against 0.698 for the main element alone at the same incidence, and the main element itself is carrying 3.98 times the circulation it carries by itself.

A slot is not a nozzle

The gap between a wing and its flap is supposed to blow fast air into a tired boundary layer. A solver with no boundary layer in it at all — no viscosity, no wake, no mixing — produces most of the lift increment anyway, and produces it on the element nobody moved.

circulation · Slot Four aeroplanes, one number. Four biplanes with the same gap and the same loadings, staggered by nothing, by four tenths, by nine tenths and by one and six tenths of a chord. Their induced drags agree to the last bit of the arithmetic — the calculation cannot even express the stagger, because the Trefftz plane is a cross-section and everything drawn here projects onto the same one. That is Munk's stagger theorem, and stating it as the drag is unchanged understates it: there is no place in the computation where the stagger could be entered.

Two wings and it does not matter where

Move one wing of a biplane a chord forward and the induced drag does not change. Not approximately, not to a good approximation — the calculation that gives the induced drag has nowhere to put the stagger, because everything projects onto the same cross-section of the wake.

circulation · Biplane How the weight is shared between the two surfaces, against the centre of gravity. The wing's load and the tail's, for an aeroplane in level flight, against the static margin. The two must sum to the weight and their moments must cancel, and those two equations decide the split. At a forward centre of gravity the tail carries down and the wing carries more than the weight; the crossing is where the tail carries nothing.

More lift than weight

An aeroplane in level flight is drawn with one arrow up and one arrow down, equal and opposite. That equation collapses the whole configuration onto one number, and it is not true of any aeroplane with a tail behind it: there are two surfaces, two equations, and the second decides the split.

circulation · Trim The local sweep of the isobars, across the span. The sweep of the half-load line at each spanwise station, for four geometric sweeps. Over the middle of the span it is the wing's own sweep, which is the simple theory being right. At the root it collapses — by twenty-one degrees at a geometric thirty-five — and at the tip it falls again. That root region is where the shock forms first on every swept wing ever built, and it is why they have waisted fuselages.

The sweep a root does not have

Simple sweep theory is one of the cleanest arguments in aerodynamics: an infinite yawed wing cannot know about the velocity along its own span, so only the normal component matters. A real wing has a root and two tips, and at the root of a thirty-five-degree wing the isobars are swept fourteen.

circulation · Sweep The worst jet amplifies the stagnation pressure by about the Mach number. The largest amplification of the stagnation pressure, over every incident turn, against the free-stream Mach number, on a logarithmic axis: the type IV jet, the best single turning shock followed by a normal shock, and the lossless ceiling. The jet's peak runs close to the line equal to the Mach number itself, from 3.5 at Mach 4 to 12.4 at Mach 12. The ceiling grows as the Mach number to the power of three and a half and is never approached. The estimate with one turning shock falls further behind the jet as the Mach number rises.

The spot a local theory cannot see

Newtonian theory gives every panel of a hypersonic vehicle a pressure set by its own angle to the stream, and no panel more than the stagnation pressure behind a normal shock. Let a shock from one part cross the bow shock of another and a supersonic jet forms that reaches the surface through weaker shocks. At Mach 8 it stagnates at 8.6 times the ceiling — and the worst amplification at every Mach number is close to the Mach number itself.

misconceptions · Newtonian One coefficient, two errors, two places they vanish. The two wall-interference errors against the slot parameter, in units of the tunnel's half-height. Both are positive for an open jet at the left and negative for a solid wall at the right, so each passes through zero — the blockage at 1.184 and the streamline curvature at 1.590. A wall has one coefficient and the two zeros are a third of a tunnel height apart.

One coefficient, two errors

A closed tunnel's walls push a measurement one way and an open jet's push it the other, so a wall somewhere between them should push it neither. There is such a wall, its coefficient is a length, and it nulls the blockage at 1.184 tunnel half-heights — and the streamline curvature at 1.590.

circulation · Tunnel interference Hull speed is not the hump. The wave-resistance coefficient of the Wigley hull, R/(½ρU²S) in thousandths, against the Froude number U/√(gL), from Michell's thin-ship integral. The curve rises through a series of humps and hollows and peaks at Fr = 0.499. The hull-speed rule's Froude number, 1/√(2π) = 0.399, where the transverse wave is as long as the hull, is neither: it lies on the steep climb between the last hollow, at 0.346, and the main hump.

Hull speed is not the hump

The hull-speed rule says a displacement vessel meets a wall where its wave is as long as its hull, at a Froude number of 0.4. Michell's thin-ship integral, computed for a standard hull, puts that speed on the steep climb between the last hollow and the main hump, and the hump itself at 0.5. Past the hump the wave resistance grows more slowly than the speed. The hollows sit where the hull's own transverse wave switches off, and a bulb that cancels at one speed multiplies the resistance at another.

regimes · Froude Two cylinders side by side pull together. The ideal stream past two cylinders side by side with a gap of a fifth of a radius between them. The stream squeezes through the gap faster than round the outsides, the pressure in the gap is lower, and each cylinder is pulled towards the other with a force of 3.6 ρU²a — while the pair together feels nothing at all.

The paradox is for the pair, not for each body

D'Alembert's paradox says a body in a steady ideal stream feels no force. Put two bodies in the stream and the theorem still holds — for the pair. Each cylinder on its own is pushed: side by side they pull together, with a force that grows without limit as the gap closes, and one behind the other they push apart, so that the front cylinder is driven upstream into the stream that is flowing past it. The forces are equal and opposite at every spacing and every angle, and their sum is exactly the zero the paradox promised.

inviscid · Dalembert Released, the side-by-side pair collides and the tandem pair parts. The distance between the centres of two cylinders released from rest in an ideal stream and free to move along the line joining them, against time in radii over the stream speed. Side by side they are drawn together and collide — neutrally buoyant ones released four radii apart after 6.5, bubbles, with no mass of their own, after 4.82. In tandem they are pushed apart and keep going.

A pair set free in a stream collides or parts

Two cylinders held in an ideal stream pull together side by side and push apart in tandem. Let them go and the forces become a motion, and the motion has a law of its own: the stream's force on each is exactly the slope of how large the pair looks from far away, so the pair moves to look bigger. Side by side that means closing, and the fluid squeezed out of the gap costs so little that nothing stops them: released four radii apart they collide in six and a half radii of stream. In tandem it means parting, for good.

inviscid · Dalembert The fuselage's overspeed reaches along the wing. The extra axial speed the fuselage alone gives the air beside it, as a fraction of the flight speed, against distance out along the wing from the fuselage's axis in fuselage radii, level with its thickest section, at Mach 0, 0.6 and 0.8. At the fuselage's side it is 2.1 per cent at low speed and 2.5 at Mach 0.8; it falls only to two-thirds of that two radii out and a quarter at five — a long body's middle " + "spreads like a line of sources, not a point — and the section beside it is already running at twelve per cent over at low speed and twenty over at Mach 0.8.

A fuselage lowers its wing root's critical Mach number

A slender fuselage barely disturbs the air: two per cent of overspeed at its side, against the twelve a wing section of ordinary thickness makes. At the wing root the two are added, and two per cent on top of twelve moves the root's critical Mach number down by more than a hundredth — as much as making the whole wing thirteen per cent thicker. The fuselage's overspeed also fades far more slowly along the span than its size suggests, because the middle of a long body spreads its disturbance like a line, not a point.

inviscid · Axisymmetric A waist moves the fuselage's overspeed off the root chord. The fuselage's axial perturbation velocity at its own surface, as a fraction of flight speed, along its length at Mach 0.8, with the wing's root chord between the two rules: the plain fuselage, which adds 0.0251 everywhere along the chord; a narrow waist 6.2 per cent deep that cancels it at mid-chord and raises it at the chord's ends; and a wide one 31 per cent deep that leaves none of it positive along the chord and lifts it on the body ahead of and behind the wing.

A waist moves the overspeed and cannot remove it

A fuselage adds two per cent of overspeed at the wing root, and a waist — a local narrowing of the body where the wing joins it — is the obvious cure. Slender-body theory says exactly what a waist can do. Its sources and sinks sum to nothing, so the velocity it adds along the body integrates to zero: it cannot remove the overspeed, only move it. Moved off the whole root chord it needs a third of the fuselage's cross-section at the wing, a sixth of what the transonic area rule would take, and it lands on the fuselage just ahead of and behind the wing, where there is room for it.

inviscid · Axisymmetric The integral's hull is fine-ended slow and full-ended fast. The waterline half-breadth, bow to the right, of the hull of least wave resistance with the Wigley hull's length, draught, depth profile and displacement, designed for Froude numbers of 0.25, 0.30, 0.40 and 0.50, beside the Wigley hull's parabola. At low speed the optimum pulls volume into its middle and leaves long, fine ends; at high speed it pushes volume out towards the ends. Every one is symmetric fore and aft.

The hull Michell's integral prefers

Michell's integral gives a thin ship's wave resistance as a quadratic in the hull's offsets, so the hull of least resistance at a given speed and displacement is a quadratic minimisation. Allowed only to reshape its waterline, the integral rediscovers the naval architect's oldest rule: fine ends for a slow ship, full ends for a fast one. Allowed to reshape its depth too, it drains the waterline and piles volume at the keel until the hull is not a ship. And it cannot grow a bulb at the bow, because it cannot tell the bow from the stern.

regimes · Froude The free waist is flat-bottomed, and follows the sweep aft. The cross-section each waist removes along the body, as a fraction of the fuselage's greatest, for the root strip unswept, at 30° and at 45°. The linear programme's waists have flat bottoms and steep sides: depth is spent only where the strip needs it. With sweep they lengthen aft rather than deepen — 24.8, 24.3 and 26.9 per cent. The best single dents, dashed, must widen and deepen instead: 39.8, 45.7 and 52.6 per cent.

A free waist needs half the depth, and the sweep costs it nothing

A cosine-squared dent in a fuselage cancels its overspeed at an unswept wing's root for about a third of the fuselage's cross-section, and nothing can remove the overspeed, only move it. Let a linear programme choose the waist's shape instead, and half of that third turns out to have been the dent's fault. The free waist is flat-bottomed and steep-sided, and for a swept root it simply runs aft with the chord, where a single dent has to widen and deepen.

inviscid · Axisymmetric Zero wave drag at one Mach number, inside a loop it cannot enter from below. The wave drag of the pair, per unit of one element's chord, against Mach number, beside a single diamond of the pair's combined thickness. The biplane's drag is zero at its design Mach number, 1.944, and rises either side. Shaded: below 1.6 the channel cannot pass the flow at all; between 1.6 and 2.15 it can, but only if it was started above the band. Accelerating from subsonic, the biplane stays choked until Mach 2.15, past its design point.

Busemann's biplane has to be flown past its design point

Two half-diamonds facing across a channel cancel each other's waves at one Mach number and carry their thickness at no wave drag. The cancellation needs the channel narrowed at its middle, and a narrowed supersonic channel will not swallow the shock that forms in it on the way up. A biplane 3 per cent thick per element, designed for Mach 1.94, stays choked until Mach 2.15, and only one that is thinner than about 2.6 per cent can start by itself at any speed.

compressible · Wave drag

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitSuperpositionOptimisationArea ruleCritical machLinearisationPotential flowPrandtl–Glauert correctionCirculationCompressibilityd'Alembert's paradoxDoublet

All concepts