Prandtl–Glauert correction — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The pocket on top of the wing
An airliner cruising at Mach 0.85 has subsonic flow almost everywhere and a patch of supersonic flow over its wing. Closing that patch takes a shock, the shock separates the layer beneath it, and the correction that predicts all of this also predicts, in the plainest terms, where it stops being true.
The wing the equation is really solving
The Prandtl–Glauert rule is usually quoted as a factor on the answer. It is a change of shape — and in three dimensions the shape it changes is the aspect ratio, so a short wing is far less affected by compressibility than a long one.
Which speed goes in the number
The most quoted threshold in the subject — air is incompressible below Mach 0.3 — is a five per cent tolerance on the density at a stagnation point wearing a physical boundary's clothes. A wing working for its living is at Mach 0.55 over its shoulder while the free stream is still at 0.3.
The equation that changes type inside its own answer
Near Mach one the coefficient of the streamwise second derivative depends on the perturbation velocity, which is what is being solved for. Two solutions of the linear equation no longer add — the leftover is three times the term the linear theory keeps — and the critical Mach number approaches one as the two-thirds power of thickness.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Critical machMach numberCompressibilityPressure coefficientSimilarityTransonicArea ruleAspect ratioBoundary conditionBoundary layerCharacteristicsDimensionless