Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Prandtl–Glauert correction — where it appears

The transformation that turns a compressible subsonic flow into an incompressible one about a stretched shape. It shows that compressibility is a change of geometry rather than of physics, and in three dimensions the shape that changes is the aspect ratio.

Named by 8 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Where the flow over the section first reaches Mach one. Two curves running towards each other. The falling one is the section's peak suction, solved exactly in incompressible flow and then deepened by the Prandtl–Glauert factor as the free-stream Mach number rises. The rising one is the pressure coefficient at which the local flow would be exactly sonic. Where they cross is the critical Mach number, and above it there is a pocket of supersonic flow on a subsonic aeroplane.

The pocket on top of the wing

An airliner cruising at Mach 0.85 has subsonic flow almost everywhere and a patch of supersonic flow over its wing. Closing that patch takes a shock, the shock separates the layer beneath it, and the correction that predicts all of this also predicts, in the plainest terms, where it stops being true.

regimes · Mach The correction belongs to the wing, not to the air. Lift-curve slope against Mach number for three aspect ratios, each computed by solving the lifting line for the wing the transformation actually implies — one of aspect ratio βAR — and dividing by β. The dashed curve is the two-dimensional rule, which is what an aerofoil section gets. At Mach 0.7 the aspect ratio of 20 has gained 35 per cent of slope and the aspect ratio of 4 has gained 24, against the 40 per cent the section rule promises both. The β in the finite-wing term cancels the β in front of it, so the shorter the wing the less compressibility does to it.

The wing the equation is really solving

The Prandtl–Glauert rule is usually quoted as a factor on the answer. It is a change of shape — and in three dimensions the shape it changes is the aspect ratio, so a short wing is far less affected by compressibility than a long one.

regimes · Similarity Which speed the number is formed on. The fractional change in air density at three places on a body, against the free-stream Mach number. At a stagnation point the density rises, and it reaches five per cent at M = 0.314 — which is where the familiar 0.3 comes from, and it is a five per cent tolerance rather than a physical boundary. At the suction peak the density falls instead, and how fast depends on the body: a lightly loaded section is milder than its own nose, and one working at cp₀ = −2 reaches five per cent at M = 0.22 and is at Mach 0.55 over its shoulder while the free stream is at 0.3.

Which speed goes in the number

The most quoted threshold in the subject — air is incompressible below Mach 0.3 — is a five per cent tolerance on the density at a stagnation point wearing a physical boundary's clothes. A wing working for its living is at Mach 0.55 over its shoulder while the free stream is still at 0.3.

regimes · Mach The coefficient of the equation's second derivative, along a chord. The bracket multiplying the streamwise second derivative in the transonic small-disturbance equation, along a chord at Mach 0.85. Where it is positive the equation is elliptic and the flow is subsonic; where it is negative the equation is hyperbolic and the flow is supersonic. Which it is at a given point depends on the perturbation velocity there, which is the thing being solved for. Forty-two per cent of this chord is hyperbolic, and no amount of inspecting the problem beforehand could have said so.

The equation that changes type inside its own answer

Near Mach one the coefficient of the streamwise second derivative depends on the perturbation velocity, which is what is being solved for. Two solutions of the linear equation no longer add — the leftover is three times the term the linear theory keeps — and the critical Mach number approaches one as the two-thirds power of thickness.

compressible · Transonic The same thickness, drawn as a body of revolution and as a wing section. The surface speed along three prolate spheroids of thickness ratio a half, a quarter and a tenth, and along the plane ellipses of the same ratios, in units of the stream speed. Each plane section speeds the flow over its middle by exactly its own thickness ratio. The body of revolution of the same ratio does so by much less — at a tenth, by two per cent where the ellipse manages ten.

Thickness costs a fuselage far less than a wing

A wing section a tenth as thick as it is long speeds the air over its middle by ten per cent. A body of revolution with the same proportions speeds it by two. The difference is not a detail of shape: a plane section pays for its thickness linearly and a body of revolution pays quadratically, and that one exponent is why a fuselage reaches the speed of sound on its surface long after its wing.

inviscid · Axisymmetric The fuselage's overspeed reaches along the wing. The extra axial speed the fuselage alone gives the air beside it, as a fraction of the flight speed, against distance out along the wing from the fuselage's axis in fuselage radii, level with its thickest section, at Mach 0, 0.6 and 0.8. At the fuselage's side it is 2.1 per cent at low speed and 2.5 at Mach 0.8; it falls only to two-thirds of that two radii out and a quarter at five — a long body's middle " + "spreads like a line of sources, not a point — and the section beside it is already running at twelve per cent over at low speed and twenty over at Mach 0.8.

A fuselage lowers its wing root's critical Mach number

A slender fuselage barely disturbs the air: two per cent of overspeed at its side, against the twelve a wing section of ordinary thickness makes. At the wing root the two are added, and two per cent on top of twelve moves the root's critical Mach number down by more than a hundredth — as much as making the whole wing thirteen per cent thicker. The fuselage's overspeed also fades far more slowly along the span than its size suggests, because the middle of a long body spreads its disturbance like a line, not a point.

inviscid · Axisymmetric A waist moves the fuselage's overspeed off the root chord. The fuselage's axial perturbation velocity at its own surface, as a fraction of flight speed, along its length at Mach 0.8, with the wing's root chord between the two rules: the plain fuselage, which adds 0.0251 everywhere along the chord; a narrow waist 6.2 per cent deep that cancels it at mid-chord and raises it at the chord's ends; and a wide one 31 per cent deep that leaves none of it positive along the chord and lifts it on the body ahead of and behind the wing.

A waist moves the overspeed and cannot remove it

A fuselage adds two per cent of overspeed at the wing root, and a waist — a local narrowing of the body where the wing joins it — is the obvious cure. Slender-body theory says exactly what a waist can do. Its sources and sinks sum to nothing, so the velocity it adds along the body integrates to zero: it cannot remove the overspeed, only move it. Moved off the whole root chord it needs a third of the fuselage's cross-section at the wing, a sixth of what the transonic area rule would take, and it lands on the fuselage just ahead of and behind the wing, where there is room for it.

inviscid · Axisymmetric The free waist is flat-bottomed, and follows the sweep aft. The cross-section each waist removes along the body, as a fraction of the fuselage's greatest, for the root strip unswept, at 30° and at 45°. The linear programme's waists have flat bottoms and steep sides: depth is spent only where the strip needs it. With sweep they lengthen aft rather than deepen — 24.8, 24.3 and 26.9 per cent. The best single dents, dashed, must widen and deepen instead: 39.8, 45.7 and 52.6 per cent.

A free waist needs half the depth, and the sweep costs it nothing

A cosine-squared dent in a fuselage cancels its overspeed at an unswept wing's root for about a third of the fuselage's cross-section, and nothing can remove the overspeed, only move it. Let a linear programme choose the waist's shape instead, and half of that third turns out to have been the dent's fault. The free waist is flat-bottomed and steep-sided, and for a swept root it simply runs aft with the chord, where a single dent has to widen and deepen.

inviscid · Axisymmetric

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Critical machCompressibilityArea ruleModel limitSuperpositionInterferenceMach numberPressure coefficientAxisymmetricPotential flowSimilaritySlender body

All concepts