Vortex patch — where it appears
Named by 7 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The shape a vortex keeps
Outside a circular patch of uniform vorticity the flow is exactly the point vortex's — not nearly, exactly — so replacing one by the other looks free. It is not. The patch has a shape, the shape has a rotation rate of its own, and there is a strain above which no shape exists at all.
What a point vortex is not
Two circular patches of vorticity move exactly as two point vortices do — the centroid velocity is the point model's with no correction of any order, and that is a theorem rather than an approximation. The trouble starts the moment they stop being circular, which is immediately.
Past three, an ellipse is a shear layer
Kirchhoff's elliptical vortex turns for ever without changing shape, and Love showed in 1893 that it stops being stable at an aspect ratio of exactly three. Computed, that threshold turns out to be the first of a sequence — a new way of coming apart every one and a half aspect ratios — and the sequence ends somewhere recognisable. A long enough ellipse is a strip of vorticity, and it comes apart the way a shear layer does, at a rate Rayleigh found for the strip.
A strained vortex holds until it has no shape to hold
A patch of vorticity in a strain has two steady shapes for every strain below 0.150 of its vorticity, a rounder one and a longer one, and none above. The longer one comes apart at the slightest nudge. The rounder one, computed with disturbances of two, three, four and five lobes, never does: it nods and holds right up to the strain at which it ceases to exist. So the existence limit is the real limit, and past it a vortex is not shattered but stretched — lingering first near the shape it has lost, for a time that grows as the fourth root of how close the strain is to the limit.
The streamfunction says which relaxed state
Decaying two-dimensional turbulence ends in a large pair of vortices, and three theories say what that pair should look like: a sinh relation between vorticity and streamfunction, a tanh, or a straight line. Their scatter plots differ only in curvature, and a real flow's scatter hides curvature. Solve the three states in the same periodic box, at the same energy and enstrophy, and a statistic that separates them turns out to be one nobody looks at: the flatness of the streamfunction, which sits above the straight line's value for every sinh state and below it for every tanh state, and does not move when unrelaxed small eddies are added.
Decaying flows end on the sinh side
Three theories predict the state a decaying two-dimensional flow relaxes to, and the streamfunction's flatness tells them apart: above 9/4 for the point-vortex theory's sinh, below for the two-level theory's tanh. Run the decay from three kinds of start and every run ends above 9/4 — including the one begun as two-level patches, the case the tanh theory was built for. Four of six land on the sinh branch itself; the other two are sinh-like without being sinh.
A strained vortex loses its ring at the limit of what it holds
A uniform patch of vorticity survives a strain up to 0.150 of its vorticity and no further. A real vortex is not uniform: its vorticity falls off outward, and in a strain its weak outer layers are drawn off while its core survives. The obvious way to predict how much survives is to apply the uniform limit layer by layer, each layer to its own vorticity. It is wrong by up to a factor of three. Built from a core inside a ring and followed by contour dynamics, the ring is stripped not at the limit of its own vorticity but at the limit of all the vorticity inside its edge, and a little after it.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitContour dynamicsVorticityCirculationEquilibriumKirchhoff ellipseStabilityStrain rateEnstrophyFlatnessInverse cascadeNegative temperature