Wave drag — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Drag with nothing to rub
d'Alembert's paradox says a closed body in a steady, inviscid flow has no drag, and four essays on this site argue it and none of them is wrong. Above Mach one it is false — the flow is still inviscid, still steady, and the drag is real, finite and quadratic in incidence.
The least drag a volume can have
A body's supersonic wave drag depends on nothing about it except how its cross-sectional area is distributed along its length. Minimising that for a given volume gives one shape — and the answer goes as the volume squared over the fourth power of the length.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Ackeret's linear theoryArea ruleConstraintd'Alembert's paradoxDragEntropyInviscidLiftMinimum-drag speedModel limitOptimisationSears haack