Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
The collection

Every essay — page 13

Page 13 of 61, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Flows and fields Ideal flow Circulation and lift Viscosity Regimes and numbers Compressible flow Transition and turbulence Fluids at work What is taught wrongly Series Concepts Regimes Refutations Search

Circulation and lift

Where lift actually comes from. The Kutta condition, the Joukowski aerofoil, and lift derived rather than assumed.

Four vortices bend twice as fast, on shorter waves. Growth rate of the fastest bending wave against its wavelength, both in the units of the equivalent single pair — one unit of growth is one e-fold in the time the wake sinks by its own spacing. Crow's pair grows at most at 0.827, at 8.54 spacings. A flap vortex of 0.3 of the tip's strength at 0.4 of its station keeps a Crow band just below that and adds a second, at 1.57 and 1.8 spacings; one of 0.5 at 0.3 merges the two into one band peaking at 1.64 and 4.4 spacings.

Four vortices bend faster, and bend the wrong one

With its flaps down a wing sheds four vortices, not two: a strong one at each tip and a weaker one at each flap's edge, and on each side the two circle one another as the wake sinks. The orbit makes the wake unstable at waves a fifth of Crow's length, growing twice as fast. But the wave that grows is the weak flap vortex being bent round the strong tip vortex, which hardly moves, while the long bend that pinches the tips together grows no faster than before. Only a counter-rotating inner vortex makes the whole wake unstable, and it does so at every wavelength.

6 figures A follower can wander further fore and aft than sideways. A flapping follower's saving, averaged over a wander of its place with the standard deviation shown, as a fraction of its own induced drag: fore and aft, holding the phase that suits its average place, for tips swinging a tenth, a fifth and four-tenths of a span; and sideways, beating in phase. The saving in place is 0.837. Sideways it has halved at a wander of 0.185 spans; fore and aft, with a fifth-span swing, only at 0.804, a third of the wake's wavelength, and with the four-tenths a cruising bird swings, at 0.37. With a tenth-span swing it never halves.

A flapping follower can drift fore and aft, but not sideways

A bird in a flapping V has to be in the right place and beat at the right phase for that place, and no bird holds its place exactly. Drifting fore and aft costs it phase, at a full beat for every wavelength of the wake; drifting sideways takes it off the leader's tip vortex. The first is two to four times cheaper than the second, it can be bought back by re-timing the beat within about one beat of the drift, and the second cannot be bought back at all. So the precision a follower needs is sideways, and the attention it needs is on its timing.

6 figures Holding the neutral point with a canard ahead takes a tail two and a half times the size. The tail area, as a fraction of the wing's, that puts the neutral point where the tail aircraft with a tail of 0.2 has it, against the tail's height above the wing's plane in spans: with no canard, with the canard, and with the canard but its wake at the tail removed. At the reference height the tail aircraft needs 0.2; with the canard it needs 0.496, of which 0.22 is for the canard's own lift ahead of the centre of gravity and 0.077 for its wake at the tail. A tail 0.25 span up needs 0.354 with the canard and 0.154 without.

The tail a canard needs costs more than the canard saves

A canard added to an aircraft as a second trimming surface saves induced drag only if the neutral point is held where it was, and holding it is not free. The canard's own lift ahead of the centre of gravity pulls the neutral point forward, its wake reaches the tail and weakens it, and the tail has to grow to put the neutral point back. For a canard of a tenth of the wing's area the tail grows two and a half times, and its skin friction is twenty to thirty counts against a saving of one to twenty. A T-tail escapes most of the wake and a third of the bill, and still only a flapped wing comes near to paying.

6 figures No elevon acts through more than a quarter of the chord. The distance behind the quarter chord at which the load an elevon adds acts — its arm — against the elevon's share of the chord. A vanishing tab at the trailing edge has an arm of exactly a quarter chord; a tenth-chord elevon 0.217, a fifth 0.185, a third 0.145, half 0.0972, and a flap of the whole chord, which is simply a change of incidence, none. However far aft the hinge, the deflection loads the whole chord and most of the load sits near the leading edge.

No elevon reaches past a quarter chord

A wing with no tail trims itself with the back of its own section, and the back of a section is a short lever. Thin-aerofoil theory prices it exactly: the load an elevon adds acts at most a quarter of a chord behind the quarter-chord point, however small and far aft the elevon is. So every unit of trim moment costs at least four units of lift, where a tail three chords back costs a third, and a camber change shaped as a pure couple would cost nothing.

7 figures An elliptic wing filters the gust like a round aperture. How much of a gust component with spanwise wavenumber k₂ survives the span average, against κ = k₂b/2, for three weights. A uniform strip is a slit and its filter is sinc², falling as κ⁻² between its zeros. An elliptic loading is a circular aperture and its filter is the Airy pattern (2J₁(κ)/κ)², whose first zero is at 3.83 and whose envelope falls as κ⁻³, but which stays near one to larger κ: the ellipse's weight is narrower, so its filter is wider. A rectangular wing of aspect ratio nine weights the span by its own loading and lies between, with the ellipse's κ⁻³ fall because its loading too goes to zero at the tips as a square root.

A wing averages a gust through its own loading

A finite span averages a turbulent gust and so tames the load it causes, but it does not average uniformly. The reverse-flow theorem says exactly how it weights the span: by the loading the wing makes at a uniform incidence. An elliptic wing therefore filters the gust the way a round aperture diffracts light, passes eight per cent more of its short scales than a uniform strip, and crosses its mean load up to four per cent more often.

7 figures A lagged re-timing passes no error down the V. The variance of each bird's phase error, in radians squared, against its place in one arm of a V, for fore-and-aft wander of half a span correlated over four beats. Holding a fixed phase, every bird's error is its offset from the bird ahead, 3.16. Re-timing with a one-beat lag, every bird's error is 0.632 — the first follower's and the thirtieth's alike, to the last digit. Re-timing as smoothly but through two half-beat lags, the error grows from 0.819 at the first follower to 1.05 at the tenth and 1.08 at the thirtieth, and is still growing slowly there.

A wandering flock passes no error down the V

In a flapping V every bird re-times its beat to the wake of the bird ahead, whose own beat is imperfectly timed, so the errors ought to pile up along the arm. With the simplest way of re-timing they do not, at all: the thirtieth bird is off its phase by exactly as much as the first. A one-beat lag and its complement add to one at every frequency, and that identity telescopes the whole arm. Re-time more smoothly and the errors do accumulate — by about a third, and then they stop.

7 figures The camber lines that carry them. The camber lines that carry the four loads at their ideal angles, heights in chords at a design lift coefficient of one. The uniform load's line is symmetric about mid-chord, 5.52% high; tapering the load over the last fifth moves the peak to 0.515 of the chord and raises it to 6.79%; tapering it over the whole chord, a = 0, puts the peak at 0.323.

A load carried to the trailing edge needs a hook

Thin-aerofoil theory runs backwards: ask for a chordwise load and it returns the camber line that carries it. Ask for the simplest load of all, the same everywhere, and the line comes back with a vertical tangent at both ends. The one at the nose is the price of a clean entry; the one at the tail is the Kutta condition being broken, and the hook it makes is what a Gurney flap is. Every NACA a-series line is a way of not paying it.

8 figures A washed-out rectangular wing is at its best at one lift coefficient. The span efficiency of a rectangular wing of aspect ratio 8 against lift coefficient, untwisted and with 2°, 4° and 6° of washout. Untwisted, it is 0.9367 at every lift coefficient. Each washout has one lift coefficient where it is best — 0.254, 0.509 and 0.763 — proportional to the twist, and each reaches the same peak, 0.9911, there. Below the peak the efficiency falls fast.

Washout is right at one lift coefficient

A twisted wing's loading is the sum of two shapes in a proportion that changes with speed, so its induced drag is a parabola in lift coefficient with its least at one design point, and that point moves in proportion to the twist. On a rectangular wing four degrees of washout puts it at a lift coefficient of 0.51 and recovers almost all the span efficiency the planform lost. On a well-tapered wing the same four degrees puts it at nineteen, and the washout is a drag paid at every speed for the stall alone.

7 figures A trainer's sortie wants the washout of its cruise, not of its average. The span efficiency of a rectangular wing of aspect ratio 8 averaged over a training sortie — eight minutes' climb, thirty of cruise, ten of slow flight and twelve of circuits — against its linear washout. Untwisted it is 0.9367. The best washout for the sortie is 3.43°, reaching 0.9774: the optimum for a lift coefficient of 0.436, the distance-weighted harmonic mean of the sortie's. The cruise alone would want 2.6°; the time-averaged lift coefficient, 0.671, would want 5.28° and lose 1.2% of the efficiency.

One twist is chosen for the speed flown per metre

A twisted wing is best at one lift coefficient and an aeroplane flies at many. Average its induced drag over a flight the way fuel and height are actually spent, per metre, and the twist that wins is the one for the root-mean-square speed of the flight — so the cruise outvotes the slow flight, a glider's circling barely counts, and a trainer's usual three or four degrees of washout turn out to be right for reasons nobody fitted them for.

7 figures A bending-moment wing has no best span until its tips are forbidden to push down. The least induced drag for the elliptic wing's lift and bending moment, against span, for a spar sized by its root moment and one sized by the moment along its whole span. Free, both fall without limit: at 1.7 times the span the root-sized optimum is 0.815 of the elliptic drag and the other 0.79, with the tips carrying downloads. With no section allowed to push down both stop where the free loading's tip load first reaches zero: at 1.225 and 0.8889 for the whole-span measure, and near 1.33 and 0.84375 for the root moment. Longer spans then leave their tips unloaded and gain nothing.

A bending moment never chooses a span

Hold a wing's lift and its bending moment and ask for the least induced drag, and the answer does not stop: the span grows for ever and the tips push down. Both celebrated answers — Prandtl's bell at √(3/2) of the span for 8/9 of the drag, and the root-moment wing at 4/3 for 27/32 — are the span at which the least-drag loading's tips stop lifting. The structure sets how much is saved; a condition nobody states sets where the saving ends.

8 figures A root's bending moment weighs the gust by the loading of a wing twisted like its moment arm. Across the span of an elliptic wing of aspect ratio 9, each normalised to unit area: the lift's weight, the loading at uniform incidence; the two roots' bending moment's, the loading of a wing washed in as |y|, with a hole at the root; and the right root's alone, the loading of a wing washed in as y on the right half and not at all on the left. The one-root weight reaches across to the left wing through the induced flow, and it is not symmetric.

One wing root feels the rolling gust its lift cannot

The reverse-flow theorem says the gust weight of any load is the loading the wing would carry at an incidence shaped like that load's arm. For the lift that is the familiar uniform-incidence loading. For the bending moment at one root it is the loading of a wing washed in towards one tip only — a weight that is not symmetric, and so passes the rolling half of a gust that the lift and the two roots together cancel. That half is a sliver of the variance and adds up to a fifth to how often the root's moment crosses its mean.

6 figures The washout a mission wants rises with the lift coefficient; a twist driven by dynamic pressure rises the other way. Washout against lift coefficient for the trainer's sortie: each lift coefficient's own best washout, 7.87° per unit of it; the best fixed washout, 3.43°; the best twist that varies with dynamic pressure, which has to wash in as the aeroplane speeds up; and a twist of the natural sign, one degree of extra washout at cruise growing with dynamic pressure, from a nose-down pitching moment. The four segments sit at Cₗ 0.82, 0.33, 1.3, 0.92.

A wing that twists with its speed washes out the wrong way

A fixed washout is right at one lift coefficient, and a flight that spends its time at four of them pays for the spread. A wing whose twist changed in flight could follow — but the twist a real wing gets for free is driven by dynamic pressure, and it adds washout as the aeroplane speeds up, exactly where less is wanted. On a trainer's sortie a degree of it at cruise raises the induced energy by a third of a point. The best twist driven by dynamic pressure washes in, and only one that follows the incidence itself removes the spread entirely.

5 figures