The collection

Every essay — page 22

Page 22 of 39, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Flows and fields Ideal flow Circulation and lift Viscosity Regimes and numbers Compressible flow Transition and turbulence Fluids at work What is taught wrongly Series Concepts Regimes Refutations Search

Flows and fields

Streamlines, particle paths and the field that carries them. What is conserved, what a picture of a flow can show, and what it cannot.

The column in height and time: a falling interface, a rising shock, a fan. A batch settling test from a uniform φ₀ = 0.1, height above the bottom against time, both scaled on the column height and the single-particle settling time. The interface with clear water (thick) falls in a straight line at 0.4538; the sediment shock rises from the bottom at 0.1484 until the two meet at t = 1.661, height 0.2464; the thin lines are characteristics of the fan, each carrying one concentration between 0.317 and packing, and the interface bends as it crosses them. Dots are the finite-volume solve on 400 cells: the interface and the sediment front.

The column the chord rule cannot settle

A suspension settling in a closed column is a kinematic wave, and its flux curve bends both ways. At the top the chord rule works: clear water meets the suspension at a single falling front. At the bottom it does not, and the bed grows behind a shock that stops short of packing and a graded layer beneath it — so the interface, instead of arriving, slows for ever.

7 figures

In the frame of the wave the walls stand still, and a bolus rides between them. Streamlines of a peristaltic channel of amplitude ratio 0.7 over two wavelengths, drawn in the frame moving with the wave, where the flow is steady and the walls are themselves streamlines. The time-mean flow is Θ = 0.5904 of the wave speed times the mean half-width, so the flow rate between centreline and wall in this frame is q = −0.4096 and the pressure rise per wavelength is 0.000 in units of μcλ/a². The centreline velocity changes sign at 0.106π and 0.894π, and the streamline through those points closes round a bolus holding 30.5 per cent of the fluid in each wavelength, which travels with the wave.

A wave on the wall is a pump

A channel whose wall only moves in and out, in a wave travelling along it, delivers a steady net flow with no part of the wall moving along the channel. In the frame of the wave the walls stand still and are streamlines, so continuity alone fixes how the laboratory flow rate follows the wall shape — and the momentum equation is needed only for one number, which also decides whether fluid rides along with the wave or leaks back against it.

7 figures

Rolls turning side by side, with the fastest downwind water where they sink. The fastest-growing mode at a Langmuir number of 0.13, looking downwind, over two roll spacings of 2.89 decay depths and 4 decay depths down. The closed curves are streamlines of the overturning; the dashed curves are contours of the downwind velocity the rolls carry, positive under the lines where the water sinks. At the surface the cross-wind flow converges onto those lines, which is where floating foam and weed collect as windrows. The amplitude is arbitrary, as in any linear mode.

The drift that turns a current into rolls

A current carrying a Stokes drift feels a force the drift makes out of the current's own vorticity, and under a wind that force is unstable. It turns the surface layer into rolls lined up downwind, with windrows where they sink. The rolls need both the current's shear and the drift's; their growth rate sees only the product; and the split between the two decides which motion gets the energy.

8 figures

The kept transport spirals into nothing as the sea deepens. The net Lagrangian transport as a vector, scaled on the Stokes transport, traced as the water depth increases from a quarter of an Ekman depth to eight, for an 8-second swell with an eddy viscosity of 0.01 m²/s. Shallow water keeps the whole transport pointing with the waves, at the right-hand end. As the sea deepens the vector shortens and swings to the right, crosses the across-wave axis near two Ekman depths, and winds into the origin, which is the open ocean's exact cancellation.

The floor that gives the drift back

In the open ocean the Coriolis force drives a current that cancels a swell's Stokes transport exactly. Over a continental shelf the sea floor holds a stress, and whatever it holds is transport the rotation does not take back. How much survives depends almost only on the depth in Ekman depths; which way it points depends on the wave.

7 figures $The best efficiency runs from nine-eighths of φ² to one. The best efficiency a peristaltic pump can reach, against the fraction of the channel its wave closes, with its two limits. For a shallow wave it is 9φ²/8, which is small — a wave closing a fifth of the channel is at best 4.5 per cent efficient. As the wave closes the channel the best efficiency tends to one, and its shortfall shrinks in proportion to the remaining gap: about 1.9(1 − φ). Nothing in between is independent of the amplitude.$

The pump that is better the more it squeezes

A waving sheet swims at a cost per metre with no amplitude in it. A waving wall pumping fluid is the same mechanism turned round, and its efficiency is nothing like that: it starts at nine-eighths of the amplitude ratio squared, is exactly 2 − √3 at half closure, and rises towards one as the wave closes the tube — where the pump stops being a wave and becomes a piston.

8 figures

What is taught wrongly

Equal transit time, Bernoulli misapplied, and the rest. Each stated fairly, then tested against a solved flow and found false.

Two parcels released together do not arrive together. The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the leading edge must meet again at the trailing edge, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. Released into the solved field, the upper parcel arrives long before the lower one — the premise is simply false, and the real speed difference is larger than it would require.

The story about air meeting up again

The most repeated explanation of lift says that air parting at the nose must rejoin at the tail, so the longer upper path forces a higher speed. The premise is false, and the speed it predicts is wrong by a factor of twenty.

7 figures

The hypotheses Bernoulli's equation needs. The equation is correct and its hypotheses are strict. Most misuse is not a wrong formula but a right formula carried across a streamline, through a machine, or into a region where viscosity dominates.

Where Bernoulli's equation applies

The equation is right. Its hypotheses are strict, and almost all misuse is a correct formula carried somewhere it does not hold — across streamlines, through a fan, or into the one layer where friction is the whole story.

6 figures

A control volume round an aerofoil. A rectangle drawn in the fluid around a lifting section. The arrows on the right-hand face show the downward velocity of the air leaving it, drawn to scale. Adding the momentum carried through all four faces to the pressure acting on them gives the force on whatever is inside, without the calculation ever going near the surface.

Air must be pushed down, and the usual sum is wrong

The momentum explanation of lift is the one physicists reach for, and it is right — a wing does hold itself up by throwing air downwards. The version usually given then does the accounting badly, and the face of the control volume it keeps turns out to carry the least of it.

7 figures

Four ways of photographing one flow, and what each of them records. The same solved flow, rendered as four different laboratory techniques would record it. Smoke from a port gives a streakline; tufts give direction with no speed in it at all; an oil film gives the direction of the friction on the surface rather than the flow above it; pressure taps give a scalar with no direction in it. None of the four is the velocity field, and only the first happens to coincide with a streamline, because this flow is steady.

What a photograph of a flow shows

Wind-tunnel pictures are the evidence this whole subject is argued from, and hardly anybody says which quantity a given technique records. They are not interchangeable — smoke, tufts, oil and pressure taps measure four different things, and none of them is the velocity field.

7 figures

What the airspeed indicator believes

A pitot tube measures the difference between two pressures, correctly, at every speed. Everything wrong with an airspeed reading is in the arithmetic applied to that difference — and the error is 2.3 per cent at Mach 0.3 and 19.4 per cent at Mach 0.85.

6 figures

The lift curve that made flight look impossible. Lift coefficient against incidence, by Newton's impact theory and by thin-aerofoil theory. One is quadratic in the angle and the other linear, so at small incidence — which is where aircraft fly — they differ by more than an order of magnitude. Newton's version says a wing large enough to carry a man would need an engine nobody could build, and for a century that arithmetic was taken as settling the question.

The theory that forbade flight

Newton treated air as a hail of particles that give up their normal momentum on impact, and got a lift coefficient of 2sin²α cos α. At five degrees that is a thirty-sixth of what a wing actually makes, and the quadratic is why powered flight looked arithmetically impossible for two centuries. The same formula is exact at Mach twenty.

8 figures

What a barometer on the wing would read at 60 m/s. The absolute pressure along an aerofoil's surface, in kilopascals, with the atmosphere put back. Nothing on the wing is near zero: the deepest point of the so-called suction peak is a few per cent below a hundred kilopascals, and the air there is still pushing on the wing hard enough to hold up a column of itself eight kilometres tall. The lift is the difference between two large pushes, not a pull.

Nothing sucks

The upper surface of a wing is universally described as being under suction, which sounds like a pull. A fluid cannot pull. The lowest absolute pressure on a wing at sixty metres a second is 96 kilopascals — a five per cent dip in a hundred — and the force does not depend on where zero was put, because the normals of a closed body sum to nothing.

8 figures