Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Induced velocity — where it appears

The velocity one vortex produces at another point, and the mechanism by which vortices carry each other about. A vortex induces no velocity on itself unless it is curved, which is why a straight pair travels and a ring propagates.

Named by 8 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two of opposite sign go somewhere. Two vortices of equal and opposite strength. Each is carried by the other's field, both are carried the same way, and the pair travels in a straight line at Γ/2πd forever, keeping its separation exactly. The speed is a consequence of one vortex's field evaluated at the other, and nothing else.

Vortices move each other

A vortex alone in an infinite fluid sits exactly still, forever — its own field is antisymmetric about it and there is nothing at its centre to be carried by. Everything a vortex does, another vortex did, and two of them already exhaust what can be written down.

inviscid · Vortex dynamics The speed depends on the core; the slope does not. A ring's self-induced speed against the logarithm of the cutoff used to compute it. The line is a quadrature of the reduced integral; the dots are an independent sum of cross products over a hundred and twenty thousand straight segments. Both diverge as the cutoff is thinned — a filament of zero thickness would move infinitely fast — so no answer here is a ring's speed until a core model is chosen. The slope, Γ/4πR, is the same whatever is chosen, and is what the check measures.

A ring moves because it is bent

A straight vortex filament induces exactly no velocity on itself — every element's direction is parallel to the line joining it to the point being evaluated, and the cross product is zero. Bend it into a ring and it drives itself forward, at a speed that diverges logarithmically as the core is thinned.

circulation · Vortex ring Where four insects have to turn round. Wagner's function — the fraction of its eventual circulation a wing has built after a stated distance of travel — with the half-stroke of each of four insects marked on it. Every one of them reverses while the curve is still climbing, so no insect wing ever reaches the circulation a steady calculation assigns it.

A calculation with no memory in it

The bee calculation is famous for using the wrong velocity. Done with the right one it still falls short, and the reason is structural: a quasi-steady sum is a statement about a wing that has always been going, and an insect's wing travels between two and five chord lengths before it turns round.

misconceptions · Bumblebee Same disc, same solidity, different number of blades, different answer. Thrust and power coefficients for six blade counts at a fixed solidity. They span a factor of 1.101 in thrust, and every one of those rotors is the same actuator disc: same area, same blade area, same tip-speed ratio. The disc theory cannot distinguish them because the blade count is not one of its variables.

A disc that knows no blades

Momentum theory replaces a rotor with a surface across which the pressure jumps, and gets the Betz limit, the induced velocity and the whole energy argument out of it. It has no chord, no section and no number of blades — and at one fixed solidity, two blades and twenty give thrust coefficients ten per cent apart.

circulation · Blade-element The loading over the disc in forward flight, at μ = 0.4. Section lift per unit span over the rotor disc, with the flight direction upwards, the advancing side to the right and the reversed-flow region outlined. The loading is not axisymmetric and cannot be: at this advance ratio the advancing blade meets 1.40 times the tip speed and the retreating one 0.60. Every quantity a hover calculation reports as a function of radius is here a function of two variables.

The side that cannot keep up

A hovering rotor is axisymmetric, so one radial distribution of circulation describes the whole disc. Move it forward and the advancing blade meets one and a half times the tip speed while the retreating one meets a half — and lift goes as the square of that. The rotor does not roll over, because the pitch is made a function of azimuth.

circulation · Rotor A blade passing the vortex it shed a passage ago. The lift the blade section feels as it passes a tip vortex at five per cent of the radius. The pulse is a doublet rather than a bump — upwash on one side and downwash on the other — so the blade is pushed one way and then the other in the width of a few chords.

A blade that flies through what it shed

A rotor blade meets the tip vortex the blade in front of it left, a fifth of a second earlier, at a few per cent of the radius. What it feels is a doublet — five and a half degrees of upwash and then five and a half of downwash within a few chords — and the peak goes as one over the miss distance.

circulation · Rotor The induced velocity, after a step in thrust. A rotor's induced velocity following a thirty per cent increase in thrust applied at fifty milliseconds. It does not jump: the air the disc has to accelerate has an apparent mass, and the response is a first-order climb to the new momentum-theory value.

The inflow that takes time to arrive

Momentum theory gives a rotor's induced velocity from its thrust, instantly. It does not arrive instantly: the air the disc has to accelerate has a mass, and the response is a first-order climb with a time constant of 33 milliseconds — a twentieth of the time the wake itself takes to convect a radius.

circulation · Blade-element At a fixed impulse every orbit is a curve of constant energy. Axial separation of two coaxial rings against the radius of the ring that started smaller, for six pairs with the same total impulse, all starting in one plane. Pairs starting nearer equal (inner curves) trace closed loops: the separation swings from one sign to the other as the rings take turns, and the radius swings with it. Pairs starting further apart run off to one side and never return. The pale curves are the separatrix, the energy of two equal free rings — it passes through the plane of the start at a ratio of 0.340 and its arms reach out to infinite separation.

Two rings leapfrog only if they start alike

Two coaxial smoke rings passing through each other in turn is the most famous thing vortices do, and it is not what two rings do in general. Set them off from one plane with different radii and below a definite ratio the smaller one draws ahead and never comes back. Which of the two happens is decided before either ring moves, by whether two separate rings could hold the pair's energy.

circulation · Vortex ring

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CirculationBlade-elementActuator discMemory kernelModel limitModel validityRegimeVortex dynamicsCore modelHamiltonianImpulseLift coefficient

All concepts