Objectivity — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The picture belongs to whoever is watching
Photograph the flow past a cylinder from the tunnel and it has two stagnation points. Photograph the same flow from a frame moving with the air and it has none at all, and its surface speed is exactly the free stream at every angle. Both pictures are correct and no measurement distinguishes them.
Longer, with nothing pulling it
Two flows with exactly the same rate of strain. In one a line of fluid grows by a factor of 148 in five time units; in the other it grows by 10. Turn the straining axes faster than the strain rate and no line grows at all, however hard the fluid is being strained.
Where a vortex stops
Four criteria decide where a vortex ends, and in two dimensions three of them are the same criterion. The fourth is a knob. And the one that is not a knob is not objective: a co-rotating pair of vortices occupies four per cent of a window to one observer and more than half of it to another.
Every snapshot says vortex, and every particle leaves
There is a flow in which the velocity gradient has complex eigenvalues at every point and every instant — a vortex by every criterion that reads a snapshot, in the frame the flow is measured in — and in which every fluid particle is flung away exponentially. The snapshot is not wrong about the gradient. It is wrong about the fluid, and it is wrong exactly when the strain's axes turn.
A vortex pair carries eddies no snapshot can see
Two equal vortices circling each other are, by every snapshot of the velocity gradient, two small vortices in a straining flow: outside their cores the flow is irrotational, and the gradient there is pure strain. Seen from the frame that turns with them, the same flow contains two large eddies, one on each side, centred where a third point would complete an equilateral triangle with the pair. Their fluid goes round with the pair for ever, and it carries no vorticity at all. They hold seventy times the area of the cores, and the only way to see them is to follow the fluid or to turn with it.
An edge no observer can move still depends on what it is averaged against
The Q-criterion puts a co-rotating vortex pair in four per cent of a window for one observer and in more than half of it for another. The cure is to average, along each fluid path, how far the vorticity departs from its mean — a number no observer's rotation can change — and take the outermost convex level of it round each core. Computed, it works: both observers find two discs of radius 1.00, twice the core radius, and no fluid inside them strays from its core in an orbit. But the edge has a setting of its own. The mean must be taken over some region, and as that region grows from a radius of 4 to 20 the edge moves from 0.90 to 1.13.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitQ-criterionRotating frameVorticityStrain rateVelocity gradientCoherent structuresEigenvalueMeasurementPathlineVortexVortex core