Concept

Vortex — where it appears

A concentrated region of vorticity, which moves with the fluid and induces a velocity on everything around it. An isolated one in an inviscid fluid never decays, and its circulation is the same on every loop that encloses it.

Named by 10 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Ideal flow past a cylinder. A uniform stream past a circular cylinder in a fluid with no viscosity. The solution is exact and closed-form: streamlines part at a stagnation point, run round the surface and close up perfectly behind, and the pressure recovers to exactly what it was in front.

Flows add up

The equations of ideal flow are linear, so solutions can be laid on top of one another. A uniform stream plus a doublet produces a cylinder that nobody put there, and almost every classical result is built this way.

inviscid · Superposition
Stokes' theorem on a solved wake at Re 40. A rectangle drawn in a viscous flow that was solved on a grid. The circulation round its boundary is computed by walking the four sides and adding up the velocity along them; the vorticity inside it is computed by adding up the stored vorticity cell by cell. The two computations share no sample point and the theorem says they must agree.

Circulation is vorticity, added up

One of these two quantities is measured by walking round a loop and one by summing over the area inside it, and a theorem says they are the same number. That reconciles the site's most confusable pair — and explains how a flow with circulation can have no spin in it anywhere.

kinematics · Vorticity
Q and the vorticity along a radius of one vortex. Two candidate measures of where the vortex is, along a radius of a Lamb–Oseen vortex. The vorticity is a Gaussian: positive at every radius, so a threshold on it puts the edge wherever the threshold is put. Q — the excess of rotation over strain — changes sign exactly once, at 1.121 core radii, and that radius is a property of the flow rather than of the person drawing it. Inside it, 71.5 per cent of the circulation.

Where a vortex stops

Four criteria decide where a vortex ends, and in two dimensions three of them are the same criterion. The fourth is a knob. And the one that is not a knob is not objective: a co-rotating pair of vortices occupies four per cent of a window to one observer and more than half of it to another.

kinematics · Coherent structures
Elliptic loading rolls up to πb/4, and it is π that puts it there. Three loadings on the same span carrying the same lift, with the rolled-up core positions marked below each. The core sits at the centroid of the shed vorticity, which is a quadrature over the loading and needs nothing about the roll-up itself. Elliptic loading gives πb/8 from the centreline, so the pair ends up 0.7854 of the span apart — the number every wake-separation rule is written against, and one of the few places in this subject where π turns up in an answer an engineer uses directly. The bell rolls up to 0.586 and a nearly rectangular loading to 0.978, because it sheds at the tips.

Where the wake ends up

The sheet a wing sheds rolls up into two cores within a few spans, and nobody can compute the roll-up cheaply. Nobody has to: what the cores conserve is fixed before they form, and for an elliptically loaded wing the answer contains π and comes out at 78.5 per cent of the span.

circulation · Tip vortex
Hill's spherical vortex. A sphere of rotating fluid travelling steadily through fluid at rest, drawn in the frame that moves with it. Outside the sphere the flow is the ordinary potential flow past a sphere; inside, the vorticity is proportional to the distance from the axis and the fluid recirculates. The two solutions match in value and in slope across the surface, and there is no body anywhere — the boundary is a streamline and nothing else.

The one rotational solution anybody can write down

A sphere of spinning fluid travelling steadily through fluid at rest, with no body anywhere in it — the boundary is a streamline and nothing else. It is exact, it is two lines long, and the reason it is the famous one turns out to be the reason it is the only one a real fluid can settle into.

inviscid · Euler rotational
One material loop, at five stages of being drawn out. A circle of fluid particles carried by four point vortices, drawn at equal intervals over fourteen time units. Its length grows by a factor of six and its shape becomes unrecognisable; the circulation round it does not move at all.

The drift was the instrument

Kelvin's theorem was checked on this site by carrying a loop and watching its circulation move by eight parts in a hundred thousand. That drift is not the flow forgetting. The exact number is a count of what is inside the loop, it does not move by anything at all, and the drift belongs entirely to the two instruments used to measure it.

inviscid · Kelvin
Below a quarter the cloud settles on the cell walls; above it, it crosses them. Paths of particles released with the air's velocity inside one cell of the vortex lattice, at Stokes numbers of 0.15 and 0.4, over 25 time units; the cell's walls, the separatrices joining the saddles, are drawn. At 0.15 the particles are flung outwards by the rotation and approach the walls ever more closely without crossing, so the cloud is compressed onto lines. At 0.4 they reach a wall with enough speed to overshoot it into the next cell, where they meet particles coming the other way: the cloud folds.

A lattice of vortices folds a cloud at the saddles' quarter

A cloud of heavy particles folds in still air above a Stokes number of one, and in converging air above a quarter. Air that turns as well as converges might have settled between them. In a lattice of vortices it settles exactly on the quarter: the vortices fling the particles to the cell walls, but only the saddles where the walls meet can make them cross. Below the quarter nothing folds, and the cloud is gathered onto the walls without limit instead.

kinematics · Acceleration
The two observers disagree twelvefold about where Q says the vortices are, and not at all about the LAVD edge. The Q = 0 contours and the outermost convex LAVD level over one orbit, in the laboratory and in the frame turning with the pair. Q > 0 covers 2.00 of the window in the laboratory and 24.94 in the turning frame; the LAVD edges enclose 6.29 in the laboratory and 6.29 in the turning frame, and the two LAVD fields differ nowhere by more than 8.0e-8 of their peak.

An edge no observer can move still depends on what it is averaged against

The Q-criterion puts a co-rotating vortex pair in four per cent of a window for one observer and in more than half of it for another. The cure is to average, along each fluid path, how far the vorticity departs from its mean — a number no observer's rotation can change — and take the outermost convex level of it round each core. Computed, it works: both observers find two discs of radius 1.00, twice the core radius, and no fluid inside them strays from its core in an orbit. But the edge has a setting of its own. The mean must be taken over some region, and as that region grows from a radius of 4 to 20 the edge moves from 0.90 to 1.13.

kinematics · Coherent structures
Freed by its inertia, a settling particle falls through a lattice of vortices several times faster than through still air. The mean settling speed of a cloud released over one cell, over its speed in still air, against the Stokes number, for still-air speeds of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.6 of the vortices' speed. 0.1: 4.82 at St = 0.02, 4.39 at 1 and 1.86 at 10; 0.3: 2.36 at St = 0.02, 1.22 at 1 and 0.605 at 10; 0.6: 1.43 at St = 0.02, 0.984 at 1 and 0.959 at 10. Without inertia most of the cloud never falls at all.

Inertia empties the vortices that would hold a settling particle, and then speeds its fall

A particle that settles slower than a lattice of vortices turns can be carried round a cell for ever: without inertia, its path is a closed curve, and Stommel showed in 1949 that half a cell can be such a trap. Give the particle the slightest inertia and every trap leaks, in a time that grows as one over its Stokes number; the freed particle is flung to the cells' edges, rides their downdraughts, and falls on average several times faster than it would through still air. More inertia undoes some of that, and a narrow band of it can hold a slow particle up indefinitely on an orbit of its own.

regimes · Particle
A flicker of a few per cent empties the suspension band and drains Stommel's traps more slowly. The share of a cloud released over one cell that is still within four cells of its start after the run, against the flicker's standard deviation as a fraction of the cells' mean strength, with a memory of three turnovers: inertialess particles falling at 0.3 of the cells' speed in still air, held in Stommel's traps, and particles of Stokes number 3 falling at 0.1, held in the suspension band. Stommel's traps hold 0.52, 0.41, 0.33, 0.16, 0.03, 0; the suspension band 0.22, 0.055, 0.015, 0.015, 0.005, 0, at flickers of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5.

Flickering vortices cannot hold a settling particle up, and still make it fall faster

A steady lattice of vortices can do two things to a heavy particle settling through it: hold it up, on closed paths or on orbits of its own, and speed its fall, by flinging it into the down-draughts. Let the vortices strengthen and fade at random, as real eddies do, and the two come apart. A flicker of five per cent of the cells' strength empties three quarters of the band of particles held up by their inertia; a flicker of a third drains Stommel's traps almost entirely. The speed-up hardly notices a flicker of a tenth, and is halved only when the cells swing by half their strength and remember it for a few turnovers. Trapping needs a steady cell; the speed-up does not.

regimes · Particle

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitCirculationVorticityConserved quantityParticleStokes numberIrrotationalKelvin's circulation theoremMeasurementObjectivityQ-criterionRelaxation time

All concepts