Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Source — where it appears

A point from which fluid appears at a stated volume rate, whose velocity field falls off inversely with distance. It has no physical counterpart on its own and is indispensable as a building block, since bodies are assembled from sources and sinks.

Named by 12 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Ideal flow past a cylinder. A uniform stream past a circular cylinder in a fluid with no viscosity. The solution is exact and closed-form: streamlines part at a stagnation point, run round the surface and close up perfectly behind, and the pressure recovers to exactly what it was in front.

Flows add up

The equations of ideal flow are linear, so solutions can be laid on top of one another. A uniform stream plus a doublet produces a cylinder that nobody put there, and almost every classical result is built this way.

inviscid · Superposition Flow net — a stream past a cylinder. Two families of curves drawn over the same flow: the streamlines, along which the streamfunction is constant, and the equipotentials, along which the velocity potential is constant. They cross at right angles at every point, because they are the two parts of a single analytic function of position.

Bodies made out of nothing

Put a source in a stream and a solid nose appears in front of it. Put a sink downstream of the source and the nose closes into a finite body. Nothing was placed in the fluid — the surface is a level set of a function, and it behaves like a wall because nothing crosses it.

inviscid · Superposition Every one of these is a solution, and they lift different amounts. Lift coefficient against the circulation the aerofoil was told to carry, with the Kutta condition's own answer marked. Each point is a complete solve: the sources were found for that circulation and the surface is a wall to within 1.3e-4 at every collocation point. Every member satisfies the equations of motion and the boundary condition, and the lift runs through them at exactly 2Γ/Uc — Kutta–Joukowski appearing as a property of the family rather than as a result about any member of it. Ideal flow round a closed body does not have a unique answer, and the Kutta condition is the extra sentence that picks one.

Nothing but the edge

Cut an aerofoil into panels, put a singularity on each, and require the surface to be a wall. The system that comes out has one more unknown than it has equations, and the row that is missing is not a bookkeeping slip — it is the fact that ideal flow round a closed body has no unique answer at all.

circulation · Panel Three contours, one force, three different accounts of it. The same vortex, and the same total force on it, computed by a momentum balance over three contours of the same area. All three give ρUΓ to eight figures. What differs is the bookkeeping: the tall box gets 16 per cent of it from pressure and the rest from momentum flux, the wide box gets 84 per cent from pressure, and the circle gets exactly half. Neither part converges on its own as the contour is enlarged — each falls off like 1/r while the contour grows like r — so the split is a property of the shape of the limit rather than of the flow.

Where the reaction to a wing's lift is

The force on a body can be computed on any contour drawn round it, and the answer is the same every time. How much of that answer is pressure and how much is momentum flux is not — it runs from three per cent to ninety-seven, and the difference is the shape of the contour.

inviscid · Far field The two bodies the far field cannot tell apart. A circular cylinder and the Rankine oval that has the same doublet strength: 1.17 radii long against the circle's one, and 0.94 tall against its one, with a source and a sink 1.2 apart inside it. On the pale ring, one and a half radii out, the two flows differ by 19 per cent of the disturbance; at six radii by one per cent; at infinity not at all. What a far field records of a body is three numbers — its circulation, its net outflow and its doublet — and nothing else survives the journey.

What the far field remembers

Three numbers survive the journey to infinity — a circulation, a net outflow and a dipole — and nothing else about a body does. Two shapes with nothing in common can therefore make the same flow a few radii away, and the difference between them dies two orders faster than the disturbance either one makes.

inviscid · Far field Ideal flow past a sphere, drawn in a meridional plane. The Stokes stream function of ideal flow past a sphere, contoured at equal intervals. Its relations to the velocity carry factors of r sin θ that the plane stream function does not have, and differencing it reproduces the closed-form velocity to 10⁻¹¹. The surface speed at the equator is exactly one and a half times the free stream, against twice for a circular cylinder: a three-dimensional body lets the flow past in two directions rather than one.

The one number that runs out at three dimensions

A stream function is one function where the velocity is two, and four essays here are built on it. It exists because the divergence vanishes, it is single-valued only if nothing inside is making fluid, and in three dimensions it is not one function at all.

kinematics · Stream function A cone sends 1.7 per cent of its jet's momentum sideways at 15°. A conical divergent section of 15° half-angle and exit area ratio 25, drawn to scale from its throat to its lip, with its virtual apex to the left. The gas leaves as a source flow: straight streamlines from the apex, each at its own angle, and a Mach number uniform on spheres centred there. On the spherical cap through the lip the flow is normal to the surface and uniform, at Mach 3.925 for a gas with γ = 1.2; its axial momentum is ρV² times the cap's projection onto the exit disc, while the mass crossing it is ρV times the cap itself. The ratio of the two areas is (1 + cos α)/2 = 0.9830, and it is the only thing the cone's shape does to the momentum. On the flat exit plane the flow is not uniform: its edge is further from the apex than its centre, and the Mach number there is higher.

The jet a cone sprays sideways

The one-dimensional nozzle sends all its gas straight out along the axis. A real divergent section is a cone, and the gas leaves it as a spray of straight lines from the cone's apex. Only the axial part of that momentum pushes, and the share that does is (1 + cos α)/2 — 98.3 per cent at fifteen degrees, 93.3 at thirty — whatever the gas, the Mach number or the area ratio, and it touches the momentum and never the pressure.

compressible · Area mach One body, three interior representations. An ellipse four fifths as tall as it is long, in a uniform stream, with three sets of singularities inside it: a point doublet at the centre, a ring of them at four tenths of the semi-major axis, and a uniform disc of them. Outside the ring the three produce the identical flow to fifteen figures. Inside, they are not remotely the same field.

The inside a flow does not decide

Every body in potential flow is built out of singularities that are not there. The exterior flow does not merely fail to determine them — it leaves an infinite family, whose members produce the identical field to the last bit outside and are nothing alike inside, and whose coefficients span five orders of magnitude for one unit free stream.

inviscid · Singularities A waist moves the fuselage's overspeed off the root chord. The fuselage's axial perturbation velocity at its own surface, as a fraction of flight speed, along its length at Mach 0.8, with the wing's root chord between the two rules: the plain fuselage, which adds 0.0251 everywhere along the chord; a narrow waist 6.2 per cent deep that cancels it at mid-chord and raises it at the chord's ends; and a wide one 31 per cent deep that leaves none of it positive along the chord and lifts it on the body ahead of and behind the wing.

A waist moves the overspeed and cannot remove it

A fuselage adds two per cent of overspeed at the wing root, and a waist — a local narrowing of the body where the wing joins it — is the obvious cure. Slender-body theory says exactly what a waist can do. Its sources and sinks sum to nothing, so the velocity it adds along the body integrates to zero: it cannot remove the overspeed, only move it. Moved off the whole root chord it needs a third of the fuselage's cross-section at the wing, a sixth of what the transonic area rule would take, and it lands on the fuselage just ahead of and behind the wing, where there is room for it.

inviscid · Axisymmetric With a wake, the bulb belongs at the bow. The Wigley hull's wave resistance with a spherical bulb, as a fraction of the bare hull's, against Froude number, with a wake fraction of 0.25: the bulb just ahead of the bow, and the same bulb just behind the stern. Without a wake the two curves are one. With it they separate: the stern's waves are made by slowed water and are weaker, so the bulb's cancelling wave has less to cancel there, and at the design speed of 0.30 the bow bulb leaves 0.443 of the bare resistance and the stern bulb 0.624.

The stern's wake puts the bulb at the bow

Michell's thin-ship integral cannot tell a ship's bow from its stern: reverse any hull and its wave resistance is unchanged, so the least-resistance hull is symmetric and a bulb is worth as much at the stern as at the bow. Real ships are fuller aft and put their bulbs forward. Let the stern's waves be made by water the hull's own boundary layer has slowed, and both follow: the optimum hull leans aft, and a bulb at the bow cuts the waves by far more than the same bulb at the stern.

regimes · Froude The free waist is flat-bottomed, and follows the sweep aft. The cross-section each waist removes along the body, as a fraction of the fuselage's greatest, for the root strip unswept, at 30° and at 45°. The linear programme's waists have flat bottoms and steep sides: depth is spent only where the strip needs it. With sweep they lengthen aft rather than deepen — 24.8, 24.3 and 26.9 per cent. The best single dents, dashed, must widen and deepen instead: 39.8, 45.7 and 52.6 per cent.

A free waist needs half the depth, and the sweep costs it nothing

A cosine-squared dent in a fuselage cancels its overspeed at an unswept wing's root for about a third of the fuselage's cross-section, and nothing can remove the overspeed, only move it. Let a linear programme choose the waist's shape instead, and half of that third turns out to have been the dent's fault. The free waist is flat-bottomed and steep-sided, and for a swept root it simply runs aft with the chord, where a single dent has to widen and deepen.

inviscid · Axisymmetric A wake held at the stern moves the volume aft a third as far. The least-resistance hull's centre of volume, in per cent of the half-length from midships, negative aft, against the design Froude number, holding the Wigley hull's length, draught, depth profile and displacement. With the linear wake it sits 2.8 per cent aft at Fr 0.30; with the shaped wake of the same propeller-disc fraction, 0.86 if uniform in depth, 1.5 if deepest at the waterline, and 0.11 if deepest at the keel, where the sources make the fewest waves.

A wake held at the stern keeps the bulb and loses the lean

A wake that slows the water steadily from bow to stern makes Michell's least-resistance hull fuller aft and puts its bulb at the bow. A real ship's wake is nearly nothing along most of the hull and strong only in its last few metres, deepest at the keel. Held there, with the same wake at the propeller, it moves the hull's volume aft by a twentieth to a half as much, and it keeps a third to two-thirds of the bulb's preference for the bow. The lean was a property of the water along the run, and the bulb a property of the water at the stern.

regimes · Froude

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitSuperpositionDoubletBoundary conditionPotential flowCirculationOptimisationSymmetryArea ruleAxisymmetricBoundary layerConformal map

All concepts