Symmetry — where it appears
Named by 12 essays across 7 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A wall made by reflection
Imposing a boundary condition on a plane is work. Putting a mirrored copy of everything on the far side of where the plane would be is not, and the plane then appears on its own — as a consequence of the symmetry rather than as a condition anybody enforced.
The wall that pushes back
A wing near the ground carries more lift than the same wing in free air, and the usual explanation — a cushion of compressed air underneath — is not what the equations say. The ground is a mirror, and what changes is not the pressure under the wing but the circulation the wing is forced to carry.
The mirror that is a circle
A flat wall is made by reflecting everything in it. A round one is made the same way, except that the mirror is an inversion — the image of a point at distance d sits at a²/d, and a vortex acquires a second image at the centre that nothing about the wall requires.
The wing that is flat, and flies
Refuting the equal-transit story by computing the parcels leaves its premise standing, and the premise is the part most readers believe: that the shape is what makes the lift. It is a claim about shapes, so it is tested with shapes — a flat plate, a symmetric section, and a cambered one flown upside down.
The one number that runs out at three dimensions
A stream function is one function where the velocity is two, and four essays here are built on it. It exists because the divergence vanishes, it is single-valued only if nothing inside is making fluid, and in three dimensions it is not one function at all.
The side that cannot keep up
A hovering rotor is axisymmetric, so one radial distribution of circulation describes the whole disc. Move it forward and the advancing blade meets one and a half times the tip speed while the retreating one meets a half — and lift goes as the square of that. The rotor does not roll over, because the pitch is made a function of azimuth.
The corners that can be done with mirrors
The method of images works for a wall and for a circle, and for a corner it works only when the angle is pi over a whole number. At every other angle the reflections never come back, the image set is infinite and dense, and the flow exists anyway — which says the method is a statement about symmetry rather than about fluids.
Hexagons remember how the heat was turned up
A layer heated from below convects in rolls, unless its top and bottom are not mirror images of each other. Then three sets of rolls at 120° can feed one another through a term the symmetry used to forbid, hexagonal cells appear before the layer is formally unstable, and there is a range of heating in which rolls and hexagons are both stable — so the pattern a layer shows depends on whether the heat was turned up or down to get there.
The stern's wake puts the bulb at the bow
Michell's thin-ship integral cannot tell a ship's bow from its stern: reverse any hull and its wave resistance is unchanged, so the least-resistance hull is symmetric and a bulb is worth as much at the stern as at the bow. Real ships are fuller aft and put their bulbs forward. Let the stern's waves be made by water the hull's own boundary layer has slowed, and both follow: the optimum hull leans aft, and a bulb at the bow cuts the waves by far more than the same bulb at the stern.
A wake held at the stern keeps the bulb and loses the lean
A wake that slows the water steadily from bow to stern makes Michell's least-resistance hull fuller aft and puts its bulb at the bow. A real ship's wake is nearly nothing along most of the hull and strong only in its last few metres, deepest at the keel. Held there, with the same wake at the propeller, it moves the hull's volume aft by a twentieth to a half as much, and it keeps a third to two-thirds of the bulb's preference for the bow. The lean was a property of the water along the run, and the bulb a property of the water at the stern.
Two spheres settling at a slant keep their slant for ever, and three do not
Two equal spheres settling through a viscous liquid fall faster together than either alone — half as fast again if they touch in line, and still five per cent faster thirty radii apart. Slanted, the pair drifts sideways as it falls, by up to three and a half degrees, and keeps the slant, the separation and the drift for as long as it falls: the two spheres always move with exactly the same velocity. Release a third and the shape is lost at once, the middle sphere drawing ahead and the outer two closing in behind it. What a pair keeps and a trio does not is a statement about symmetry, and reciprocity is half of it.
A larger sphere overtakes its neighbour and leaves on the line it came in on
Two equal spheres settling together never change their shape. Make one of them two per cent larger and the pair becomes an encounter: the larger sphere sinks past the smaller round a path that bulges out and comes back, slowed sixteenfold at contact but never stopped, and it leaves at exactly the offset it arrived with. The smaller sphere swings seven radii sideways while the larger is above it and gives every radius back while the larger is below. In Stokes flow, meeting a neighbour displaces nothing — unless the spheres touch, and a hundredth of a radius of roughness is enough to make every touching path leave on the same line.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Model limitBoundary conditionCirculationLift coefficientMethod of imagesSourceWall interferenceBoundary layerCreeping flowDisplacement hullFroude numberGround effect