Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Verification — where it appears

Establishing that a computed field solves the equations rather than merely looking as though it does, by producing a quantity twice by routes sharing no arithmetic. It is the only test available for a flow, because a wrong field is smooth and a drawing of one looks entirely correct.

Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three accounts of lift, one of them tuned to be exactly right at five degrees. Thin-aerofoil theory, which is the answer; Newtonian impact theory with its constant tuned so that it passes exactly through the truth at five degrees; and the equal-transit story, which has no free constant and sits along the bottom. At the tuning point the tuned model and the truth are indistinguishable, and no measurement there separates them.

A right total from a wrong picture

Newtonian impact theory has a free constant in it. Tuned at five degrees it reproduces a NACA 2412's lift exactly, and no measurement at five degrees can tell it from the truth. What separates them is the derivative — a lift-curve slope 2.8 times too steep — which is a second constraint rather than a better one.

misconceptions · Momentum lift Two divergence-free fields with the same boundary conditions. On the left, the exact potential flow round a cylinder moving through fluid at rest. On the right, the same flow with a divergence-free eddy added — one that has no normal velocity on the body or on the outer circle, so it changes nothing about what crosses a boundary. Both fields conserve mass, both satisfy the wall condition, and only one is the flow. Nothing in the drawing says which.

The flow with the least energy in it

Draw a flow that conserves mass and does not go through the walls, and it will look exactly like a solution. There are infinitely many of them and one is the flow. What separates it from the others is not visible anywhere in the picture — it is a number, and the number is an energy.

inviscid · Least energy A uniform scalar in a fluid at rest, under two face rules. Nothing is flowing and the scalar starts at one everywhere. The swept-volume rule leaves it at one to the last bit, at every step of the two time units. The midpoint rule moves it by two parts in ten thousand, on a mesh motion that begins and ends in the same place, and the excursion looks exactly like a physical transient.

The mesh that makes its own mass

The transport theorem holds for a region moving at any velocity, which is what makes a moving-mesh calculation possible. Discretised carelessly it is not an identity but an approximation, and a fluid at rest with a uniform density then gains density from the motion of a grid — smoothly, plausibly, and looking exactly like a physical transient.

kinematics · Transport theorem The pressure of a sum against the sum of the pressures. Ten points around a cylinder with circulation, with the pressure coefficient of the combined flow plotted against what adding the two flows' separate coefficients would give. Nothing lies on the diagonal. The gap is exactly −1 − 2u_A·u_B/U², an identity checked to the last digit at every point, and it is not small: at one of these points the two answers differ by 1.92, which is more than the whole range of a suction peak.

The one thing that does not add up

Laplace's equation is linear, so flows can be laid on top of one another and almost every classical result is built that way. The two things anybody actually wants out of a flow — the pressure and the force — are quadratic in the velocity, and neither of them adds at all.

inviscid · Superposition

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

CirculationKinetic energyMeasurementAdded massBoundary conditionCamberConservationConstraintControl volumeConvergenceDiscretisationDoublet

All concepts