Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Blood flow — where it appears

The flow of blood through the heart and vessels, pulsatile in the large arteries and nearly steady in the smallest. Its vessels branch in trees whose sizes can be compared with rules for the cheapest steady flow and for passing a pressure pulse without reflection.

Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Where a profile stops being a parabola. Two measures of how far Womersley's solution has left the quasi-steady parabola, against the Womersley number, both logarithmic. The amplitude deficit reaches a hundredth at α = 0.28 and the phase lag reaches a hundredth of a right angle at α = 0.22 — both well below α = 1, which is where the unsteady and viscous terms are equal and is the value the number is named for. By α = 1 itself the flow is already a tenth short and eight degrees late.

Where the parabola goes

A pipe carrying a steady flow has a parabolic profile, and the Womersley number is supposed to say when an oscillating one still does. For the flow rate it is very nearly honest — one per cent at α = 0.91 — and for the phase it is out by a factor of three, because a lag is second order in the number and an amplitude deficit is fourth.

regimes · Womersley The exponent a pulsing tree wants is between two and three. The tree's reflection at its root, averaged over the pulse's ten harmonics with the pulse's own weights, against the branching exponent k in r_parent^k = 2 r_daughter^k — two is area-preserving, three is Murray's law. With a wave speed that does not change with radius the best exponent is 2.15, just above the inviscid match of two; with one that rises as smaller arteries stiffen, 2.58, just above 2.5. Viscosity in the smallest branches pushes the best exponent a little towards Murray's.

Murray's law is not the rule for a pulse

Murray's law sizes a branching vessel for the cheapest steady flow, and at every junction built to it a pressure pulse is partly reflected. The rule that makes a junction transparent to a pulse is a different exponent, set by how the wave speed changes with radius. A tree is not the sum of its junctions, either: a Murray tree six generations deep reflects a third of the pulse at the heart rate, three times what one of its junctions does, and viscosity in the smallest branches means no area rule can make it transparent at every frequency. The best a pulsing tree can do lies between area-preserving and Murray.

regimes · Womersley Area-preserving in the aorta, Murray's cube in the small arteries. The branching exponent k, in r_parent^k = r₁^k + r₂^k, that makes one junction reflect least of the heart's pulse, against the parent artery's radius, for a symmetric split and for side branches a half and 0.15 of the continuing trunk. In the aorta, where the pulse is carried by inertia, the transparent rule is close to 2 — area preserved — whatever the asymmetry. In arteries under a millimetre, where viscosity carries it, it is 3: Murray's law, the rule for the cheapest steady flow, is exactly the rule that passes the pulse. Asymmetry moves the answer only in between.

Murray's law passes the pulse where the pulse is viscous

The rule that makes an arterial junction transparent to the heart's pulse was an exponent, and real arteries do not split evenly: the aorta sheds side branches a fraction of its size and carries on. For a lopsided junction the transparent rule is still an exponent — the same one, exactly, while viscosity is negligible. With viscosity it is a single function of the parent's Womersley number: close to area-preserving in the aorta, and exactly Murray's cube in arteries under a millimetre, where the pulse moves as the steady flow does. The asymmetry matters only in between, and a lopsided tree reflects far less than an even one.

regimes · Womersley Local transparency is the best tree only when the ends absorb. The root's reflection at the heart rate against the reflection at the tree's leaves, for the map tree, for the single exponent that is best at that leaf reflection, and for Murray's. With leaves that reflect nothing the map tree is the best of all, 0.035 against 0.0419: making every junction transparent is then the whole job. As the leaves start to reflect, the best single exponent pulls ahead, because it leaves its junctions slightly mismatched in the way that cancels the echo coming back from the ends; at a leaf reflection of 0.5 it reflects 0.0735 to the map tree's 0.13.

A tree transparent at every junction is not the quietest

The branching rule that lets a heart's pulse through one junction without reflection is set by that junction's Womersley number: area-preserving in the aorta, Murray's in the small arteries. Build a whole arterial tree that way, every junction at its own transparent rule, and it reflects more of the pulse than the best tree built to a single exponent. The single exponent wins by leaving its junctions slightly mismatched, in the way that cancels the echo from the tree's own ends — the trick an antireflection coating plays on light.

regimes · Womersley

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Womersley numberImpedanceModel limitPulsatile flowReflectionMurray's lawOptimisationScalingViscosityWave speedBranchingDimensionless

All concepts