Hele-shaw — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The exact theory, drawn by viscosity
Two flat plates a millimetre apart, syrup between them, an obstacle in the gap. The Reynolds number is a hundredth, inertia is absent, and the streamline pattern is the potential flow past that obstacle — exactly, to a part in ten billion. The one hypothesis ideal flow cannot do without is the one this flow most conspicuously breaks.
The cell draws a larger cylinder
A Hele-Shaw cell draws the streamlines of ideal flow past an obstacle and cannot obey the one rule ideal flow breaks: the fluid must stop at the obstacle's wall. It does stop there, in a layer a third of the gap thick, and far away the whole correction amounts to one thing — the cell is drawing ideal flow past a cylinder one layer-thickness too big, and the obstacle has exactly that cylinder's drag.
The fastest finger is set by the gap and one number
Push air into oil between two glass plates and the interface breaks into fingers. The averaged law of the cell makes the instability exact in its linear stage: every wavelength is driven in proportion to its wavenumber, surface tension holds back the short ones as the cube, and the fastest finger is π gap widths divided by the square root of a capillary number. A narrow channel stays flat; a wide one chooses how many fingers to make; and a growing bubble of air makes more of them the larger it gets.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AnalogyCreeping flowDarcy's lawModel validityThe no-slip conditionPotential flowBoundary layerCapillary numberDisplacement thicknessDragFlow visualisationGrowth rate