Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Instrument — where it appears

The device a measurement is made with, together with the operator it applies to the flow. Every one has a window — an exposure, a response time, a probe volume — so what it reports is the flow convolved with something the experimenter chose and rarely states.

Named by 13 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The dynamic pressure is not ½ρU², and by Mach 0.85 it is out by a fifth. The pressure difference a pitot tube measures, divided by the incompressible dynamic pressure ½ρU², against Mach number. The dashed curve is the two-term series 1 + Ma²/4 + Ma⁴/40 that the rule of thumb comes from. An airspeed inferred from ½ρU² alone reads high, and the error is entirely predictable — which is why it is corrected rather than tolerated.

What the airspeed indicator believes

A pitot tube measures the difference between two pressures, correctly, at every speed. Everything wrong with an airspeed reading is in the arithmetic applied to that difference — and the error is 2.3 per cent at Mach 0.3 and 19.4 per cent at Mach 0.85.

misconceptions · Pressure Two integrands, and the wrong one claims 9.58 per cent more drag. The two things that get integrated across a wake, each scaled to its own peak so the shapes can be compared. The momentum integrand u(U − u)/U² is the drag; the mass integrand (U − u)/U is the displacement thickness, and it is not a drag at all. They differ by a factor of u/U inside them, so the mass one is fatter wherever the deficit is deep — and its integral here is 1.1 times the momentum one's. That ratio is decided by how deep the wake is rather than by how wide: at a twentieth of this momentum thickness it falls to 1, and at twice it rises to 1.25. The error is smallest exactly where a survey is properly done, far downstream where the wake has spread and shallowed.

Weighing what is missing

A control volume drawn round a wing gets the lift out of it, on a flow that was solved exactly. The wake survey asks the same box for the drag on a flow nobody has solved, and it is how a real aerofoil's drag is known — with three assumptions, all of which are checkable, and one integral standing next to it that is wrong.

misconceptions · Momentum lift Three instruments, three derivatives, one field. A density field — a shock, smoothed to its own thickness — and what each of the three optical techniques records across it, each scaled to its own peak so the shapes can be compared. Interferometry follows the density itself; schlieren follows its first derivative and peaks where the density is changing fastest; shadowgraph follows the second and is a light-and-dark pair straddling the same place. None of them is looking at the flow: the refractive index of a gas is linear in its density, so every one of them is a densitometer and the differences between them are differences of calculus rather than of apparatus.

An instrument that takes a derivative

Dye, smoke and seeded particles mark the fluid and read the marks. The optical ones mark nothing — light passes through and is bent — and what a plate records is not the flow but a derivative of its density. Two of the three are therefore exactly blind to a uniform stream, at any speed it happens to have.

misconceptions · Visualisation A degree of temperature is worth 0.34 per cent of pressure. The error in the pressure a paint reports, against how much warmer the surface is at the test condition than at the reference, at four pressures. At 0.8 of the reference pressure the sensitivity is -0.34 per cent of pressure per kelvin, so 10 degrees is -3.45 per cent. That is not a small number against what the technique is used to measure, and a model's surface temperature is not uniform: it is warmer where the flow has been brought to rest and cooler where it has accelerated, which means the temperature error is largest exactly where the pressure gradients are. The standard remedy is a second, temperature-sensitive paint measured at the same time — an instrument added to correct an instrument.

The paint that measures the wrong field

Dye, seeded particles and the optical methods all look through the flow or at something put in it. Pressure-sensitive paint looks at the surface, reports a scalar rather than a derivative, and turns a row of taps into a field. What quenches its luminescence is oxygen, which is what makes it a pressure gauge — and temperature, which is the other field a flow is guaranteed to produce.

misconceptions · Visualisation The layer that grows from a change of surface. The internal boundary layer's height against distance downwind of a change in roughness, with the sublayer inside it that is genuinely in equilibrium with the new surface. The layer grows as the fetch to the four-fifths power and the equilibrium sublayer is a tenth of it.

How far downwind a surface is remembered

Walk from a field into a wood and the wind ten metres above your head is still the field's wind. It takes about a kilometre of trees before a ten-metre measurement is measuring the trees — a hundred times the height it is made at, and a great deal more than most masts are given.

turbulence · Roughness The line the dye actually draws. A streakline in an oscillating uniform stream: everything released from the origin over the last 3.4 units of time, drawn where it has got to at one instant. The parameter along it is release time, not distance and not time of flight, which is why it is a record rather than a curve of the field. The mean speed of 1 exceeds the amplitude of 0.6, so the fluid never reverses and the filament is single-valued in x.

The line the dye actually draws

The streakline is the curve most photographs really show, and of the three curves it is the hardest to compute, because it needs the whole history of the flow. This draws it, in a flow where all four curves have closed forms, and the third curve turns out to be a different kind of object from the other two rather than a third example of the same one.

kinematics · Flow curves The one curve of the four that measures a gradient. A row of particles released along a line at one instant, seen at 4 later times, in a layer profile. Each line has been displaced by the local velocity times the elapsed time and by nothing else, so dividing the displacement back out returns the profile exactly — checked here to machine precision at every one of two hundred heights. A streamline, a pathline and a streakline each report where fluid went; this one reports how fast neighbouring fluid was going relative to its neighbour, which is the quantity a boundary layer is made of and the one the other three never show.

The curve that measures a gradient

Three of the four curves drawn through a flow answer the same question — where did the fluid go. The fourth answers a different one. A line of particles released together is displaced by the local velocity and by nothing else, so its shape is the velocity profile, and dividing the elapsed time back out returns that profile exactly rather than approximately.

kinematics · Flow curves Measuring the air temperature in flight is not measuring the air temperature. Three temperatures against Mach number in a stream at 220 K: the free stream itself, the stagnation temperature a perfect probe would read, and what a probe recovering 0.98 of the rise actually reads. At Mach 0.85 the rise is 31.79 K and the probe misses 0.64 K of it. The instrument is a small stagnation region with a thermocouple in it, so it obeys the same recovery arithmetic a wall does — a probe is a wall told nothing about its temperature, made small and put on a stalk, and its recovery factor is a calibration constant rather than a one.

The thermometer that heats itself

A total-temperature probe is a wall told nothing about its temperature, made small and put on a stalk, so it obeys the same recovery arithmetic an aircraft skin does. Its recovery factor is a calibration constant near 0.98 rather than a one — and the static temperature inferred from its reading amplifies that shortfall rather than inheriting it.

compressible · Recovery A window one core wide reads the vortex 7.5 per cent slow. The tangential velocity across a Lamb–Oseen vortex, in units of its core radius and of Γ/2π divided by it, as it is and as particle image velocimetry reports it with square interrogation windows of three widths — the average of the velocity over each window, which is what a correlation over the window returns to first order. The true peak is 0.6382 at 1.1209 core radii. A window 0.5 core radii wide reports 98.0 per cent of it, 1.021 times as far out, a window 1 core radii wide reports 92.5 per cent of it, 1.084 times as far out and a window 2 core radii wide reports 77.1 per cent of it, 1.334 times as far out. The instrument that measures velocity directly still reports a slower, fatter vortex than the one there, by an amount set entirely by the window against the core.

The window every vector is averaged over

Particle image velocimetry is the one flow-visualisation technique that reports the velocity itself, and it still applies an operator: every vector is an average over an interrogation window. A window is a filter with a transfer function, and it makes a vortex slower and fatter, a thin shear layer exactly as thick as the window, and some features smaller than the window point the wrong way.

misconceptions · Visualisation One per cent of noise on the image, 1.43 on the axis. The field recovered by onion peeling on 50 rings from one view carrying noise of one per cent of the instrument's own peak reading, from an interferometer's projection and from a schlieren system's deflection, against the true field. On the axis, where the truth is 1, the projection gives 1.431 and the deflection 0.876; over the whole radius their root-mean-square errors are 0.0742 and 0.0219, so the deflection is the quieter route here. Near the edge both are clean, and the error gathers towards the axis — where the field is largest and the flow usually most interesting.

One view is enough, and the axis pays for it

An axisymmetric flow — a jet, a plume, a flame — can be reconstructed from a single optical view, because Abel's integral inverts exactly. The inversion runs from the outside in, every error made on the way reaches the axis, and whether it arrives multiplied depends on which instrument took the picture.

misconceptions · Visualisation A particle is a low-pass filter. The fraction of a fluctuating flow's velocity that a particle follows, and the phase by which it lags, against the Stokes number. At one the particle follows 71 per cent of the motion and lags by 45 degrees — which is the corner frequency of a first-order filter, arrived at from mechanics rather than from electronics.

A particle is a low-pass filter

A seeding particle does not report the flow; it reports the flow through its own transfer function. At a Stokes number of one it follows 71 per cent of the motion and lags it by 45 degrees, and a fifty-micron droplet at a kilohertz is following two per cent of what it is supposed to be measuring.

regimes · Particle Every output of the air-data reduction, and how hard it leans on each reading. The logarithmic sensitivity of each derived quantity to each of the three readings — the total pressure, the static pressure and the indicated total temperature — at Mach 0.3 and Mach 0.85, at 11 km with a probe recovering 0.98: a one per cent error in a reading times the number is the per cent error it puts into the output. The Mach number leans on the two pressures by 8.08 and −8.08 at Mach 0.3 and by 1.13 and −1.13 at Mach 0.85, and not at all on the temperature. The static temperature leans on its probe by exactly one and on the pressures by −0.280 at Mach 0.3 and −0.281 at Mach 0.85 — almost the same. The true airspeed leans on the probe by exactly one half and the density by exactly minus one, at every speed.

Three readings, and the one each answer leans on

An aircraft works out the air it flies through from three readings — a static pressure, a total pressure and a probe's temperature — and every derived number inherits their errors through one small table of sensitivities. Written out, the table says the airspeed is afraid of the pressure sensors almost to Mach one at cruise altitude and only to Mach 0.52 at sea level, and that the density belongs to the thermometer at every speed.

compressible · Recovery The part of a field 4 cameras cannot see. Middle, a field with no symmetry on a 16 × 16 grid. Left, the part of it that projects to exactly nothing in every one of 4 views, shaded one way above zero and the other below: a pattern of streaks and hollows that cancels along every ray. Right, the field with that part taken away. The middle and right fields give identical pictures in all 4 views, to 2e-13 of the largest ray, and no reconstruction from those views can tell them apart. The invisible part is one combination of 177 independent patterns the views cannot see.

Four cameras and a field they cannot see

An axisymmetric flow can be rebuilt from one photograph because its symmetry supplies every other view. A flow without an axis has to be photographed from several directions, and a few directions do not merely give a noisy answer — they leave whole patterns of density that every camera records as nothing. Four views of a 16 × 16 field see 79 of its 256 independent patterns and are exactly blind to the rest.

misconceptions · Visualisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

MeasurementModel limitVisualisationMisconceptionDensityMach numberBoundary layerCorrelationDynamic pressureIll-posedInverse problemMaterial line

All concepts