Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Inertia — where it appears

The tendency of fluid to keep moving as it is, which is what the nonlinear term in the momentum equation represents. Its ratio to viscosity is the Reynolds number, and the two limits in which it dominates or vanishes are the two halves of this subject.

Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Particles at St = 1, against the flow that carries them. Particle paths and the streamlines they were released on, in this site's exact cylinder solution. At small Stokes number the two are indistinguishable and the body catches nothing; as the particles get heavier their paths straighten, cross the streamlines, and begin to strike. The paths are integrated with Stokes drag and nothing else — no gravity, no lift, no effect of the particles on the flow.

Whether the droplet turns

The air goes round the wing. Whether what is carried in it goes round too is decided by one number — and below a critical value of that number the body collects nothing at all, however many droplets are thrown at it, because the flow turns every one of them in time.

regimes · Particle How small is small enough. The error in Stokes' law for the drag on a sphere, against the Reynolds number, both logarithmic. Oseen's correction is the first term the neglected inertia puts back, and it says the error is 3Re/16: one per cent at Re = 16/297 = 0.054, five per cent at 0.28, and already sixteen per cent at Re = 1 — which is the value at which the two terms the Reynolds number compares are equal, and is where every textbook draws the boundary of creeping flow.

How small is small enough

Creeping flow drops the inertia terms and gets an exact answer for the drag on a sphere. The Reynolds number at which those terms are equal is one — and at one, Stokes' law is already sixteen per cent low. The honest boundary is 0.054, and the reason it is so far down is the same reason the theory needed repairing in the first place.

regimes · Reynolds Two terms, one with viscosity in it and one without. Ergun's two contributions to the pressure gradient, against the pore Reynolds number, on logarithmic axes. The viscous term rises with the first power of the velocity and the inertial one with the square, so on these axes they are straight lines of slope one and two and there is exactly one crossing. The second term contains no viscosity at all — it is the price of accelerating fluid into every pore and out again — which is why a linear resistance law has to fail eventually whatever the fluid is.

Where Darcy stops

A linear resistance law has to fail eventually, because pushing fluid into a pore and out again costs energy that has nothing to do with viscosity. Where it fails is one dimensionless number, and that number is 150/1.75 — read out of a correlation's own constants rather than measured.

applied · Porous A threshold that is a curve, not a pressure. The tension a rectangular pulse has to reach to make a five-micron bubble run away, against how long the pulse lasts. At a tenth of a microsecond it takes forty bar; at a hundred microseconds it takes 1.05, which is within about one per cent of the static threshold. There is no such thing as the cavitation pressure of this bubble on its own.

A threshold that is also a duration

The cavitation number treats inception as a pressure: below it the liquid tears, above it does not. A five-micron bubble asked to grow in 0.3 microseconds needs 43 bar of tension and the same bubble given a hundred needs 1.05, because it has to make a journey and not merely respond.

applied · Cavitation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ThresholdDimensionlessParticle trackingStokes' dragAsymptoticsBubble dynamicsCavitationCollection efficiencyCorrelationCreeping flowDarcy's lawDimensionless number

All concepts