Non dimensionalisation — where it appears
Named by 5 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The Reynolds number, and the length in it
The most useful number in fluid mechanics has an arbitrary quantity buried in it, and quoting one without saying which length was used makes it meaningless. That detail is where most misuse comes from.
The cheapest way to stay up
There is a speed at which an aircraft's drag is least, and a different, slower speed at which its power is least. The ratio between them is the fourth root of a third — a number that does not depend on the aircraft, the altitude, or anything else about the flight.
The number that does not depend on the tunnel
A pressure measured in a wind tunnel is a fact about that tunnel on that day. Divide it by the dynamic pressure and it becomes a fact about the shape — the same at any speed, in any fluid, at any scale, and equal to exactly one where the flow comes to rest.
The wing the equation is really solving
The Prandtl–Glauert rule is usually quoted as a factor on the answer. It is a change of shape — and in three dimensions the shape it changes is the aspect ratio, so a short wing is far less affected by compressibility than a long one.
A solid, if it is not given time
The Deborah number is the only group on this site with no fluid in it — two times and nothing else — and it says a material is a solid or a liquid depending on how long anybody watches. What it throws away is that no real material has one time, and the spectrum it replaces changes the answer in kind rather than in degree.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Lifting lineSimilarityAspect ratioBernoulli's equationBlasiusBoundary conditionCompressibilityConstitutive lawCritical machDimensionlessDimensionless numberDrag