Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Dynamic similarity — where it appears

The condition that two flows have the same dimensionless numbers, so that one is a scale model of the other in every respect. Matching all of them at once is generally impossible, which is what makes model testing a craft rather than a procedure.

Named by 3 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Reynolds number: one number, four different flows. Reynolds number is inertia ÷ viscosity. It is not a property of the fluid or of the shape but of the combination, and crossing a threshold changes the physics rather than the magnitude.

The model that cannot be matched

A scale model behaves like the real thing when its dimensionless numbers agree. With one number that is a matter of choosing the tunnel speed. With two it is usually impossible, and every wind-tunnel result ever published has been obtained in spite of that.

regimes · Similarity The pressure coefficient, read off the field. The closed-form surface pressure of a cylinder, and the same quantity computed from the speeds of the solved field at the same points. The coefficient is exactly one where the flow stops and exactly minus three at the shoulder, and those two numbers are properties of the shape rather than of the tunnel.

The number that does not depend on the tunnel

A pressure measured in a wind tunnel is a fact about that tunnel on that day. Divide it by the dynamic pressure and it becomes a fact about the shape — the same at any speed, in any fluid, at any scale, and equal to exactly one where the flow comes to rest.

inviscid · Pressure The same data, in a basis the theorem allows just as much. The identical two hundred and forty points, plotted as F/(mu U d) — which is the drag coefficient times the Reynolds number, a perfectly legitimate pi group forming a complete pair with the abscissa. The result is a straight line of slope 0.9985 through five decades with an r-squared of 0.9985, and it contains no physics: the ordinate contains the abscissa.

The groups are not the only groups

Buckingham's theorem fixes how many dimensionless groups an answer can depend on and says nothing about which. Two of the infinitely many legitimate choices are used here on the same data: one manufactures a straight line through five decades out of a constant, and the other erases Stokes' law completely.

regimes · Dimensional

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Reynolds numberWind tunnelBernoulli's equationBuckingham's pi theoremCorrelationDimensional analysisDimensionlessDimensionless numberDrag coefficientMach numberMeasurementMisconception

All concepts