Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Drag coefficient — where it appears

Drag divided by the dynamic pressure and a reference area, in which form two bodies of different size may be compared. Its near-constancy over decades of Reynolds number for a bluff body is the dissipation anomaly seen as a force.

Named by 14 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

5 quantities, 3 rows, 2 left over. The dimension matrix for the drag on a sphere: one column per quantity, one row per base dimension, and every entry an exponent. Buckingham's theorem is a statement about this matrix and nothing else — the number of independent dimensionless groups is the number of columns minus the rank, computed here by elimination. Nothing about fluids enters until somebody decides which columns to write down.

Counting what matters

Five quantities decide the drag on a sphere, and the experiment that measures it has one curve in it rather than a five-dimensional table. The reason is a rank: the matrix of dimensions has three independent rows, and what is left over is the number of dimensionless groups the answer can possibly depend on.

regimes · Dimensional The tunnel makes the stream 7.4% faster. The flow past a cylinder between two walls, solved from the closed form of an infinite image row rather than from a truncated sum. The walls are streamlines exactly — that is what the images are for, and the normal velocity on them is zero to the last bit — and the flow beside the body is squeezed between the body and the wall, which is the whole of the blockage effect. The stream at the model is 7.40% faster than the speed the tunnel's own instruments report far upstream.

The instrument in the answer

A model in a wind tunnel is not a model in the sky. The walls are supplied by an infinite row of reflections, the stream at the model is faster than the tunnel's own instruments report, and the correction is not an empirical fudge — it is a series with a closed form.

applied · Metering The Kirchhoff flow past a flat plate. A uniform stream meeting a flat plate held across it, with two streamlines leaving the edges and never returning. Between them is a wake of fluid at rest at a constant pressure. The equations solved are the same equations that give d'Alembert's paradox for a closed body, and this flow has a drag coefficient of 0.8798.

Drag in the theory that forbids it

d'Alembert's paradox is a theorem about flows that close behind the body. Stop requiring that, let two streamlines leave the edges and never come back, and the same equations — no viscosity, no vorticity — produce a drag coefficient of 0.8798.

inviscid · Free-streamline Morison's two terms over one cycle, at KC = 10. The drag term, in phase with the velocity and going as its square; the inertia term, in phase with the acceleration and ninety degrees ahead of it; and their sum, which is what a load cell records. The peak of the total is not the peak of either, and its position in the cycle is the only thing in the record that says how the two are divided.

Long enough to make a wake

A Reynolds number cannot ask whether an oscillating flow gets round a body before it turns and comes back, because it has no time in it. The Keulegan–Carpenter number can, and it decides which of Morison's two terms is the force. What it discards is the phase — and a peak force measurement cannot recover it.

regimes · Keulegan–Carpenter number The same data, in a basis the theorem allows just as much. The identical two hundred and forty points, plotted as F/(mu U d) — which is the drag coefficient times the Reynolds number, a perfectly legitimate pi group forming a complete pair with the abscissa. The result is a straight line of slope 0.9985 through five decades with an r-squared of 0.9985, and it contains no physics: the ordinate contains the abscissa.

The groups are not the only groups

Buckingham's theorem fixes how many dimensionless groups an answer can depend on and says nothing about which. Two of the infinitely many legitimate choices are used here on the same data: one manufactures a straight line through five decades out of a constant, and the other erases Stokes' law completely.

regimes · Dimensional In clean water a bubble rises nearly three times as fast as the same bubble in tap water. The terminal rise speed of an air bubble in water at 20 °C against its radius, from buoyancy balanced against drag: with a clean, shear-free surface using Moore's law, and with a surface immobilised by contamination using the rigid-sphere correlation. At 0.3 mm the clean bubble rises at 13.0 cm/s against 6.7; at 0.5 mm at 31.0 against 11.2, a factor of 2.76. Beyond a radius of 0.47 mm the clean bubble's Weber number passes one, its shape flattens, and a spherical calculation stops describing it; that region is shaded. Nothing about the bubble's size, gas or liquid changes between the two curves — only whether its surface can move.

The vorticity a clean surface cannot refuse

A clean bubble's surface cannot hold a shear stress, and it is easy to conclude that it makes no vorticity. On a curved surface it must carry exactly 2κu — three times the speed over the radius at a sphere's equator, whatever the Reynolds number. That is so much weaker than a rigid wall's that the flow stays irrotational to leading order, and the bubble's drag is the dissipation of that irrotational flow: 48/Re, three to ten times below a rigid sphere's.

kinematics · Boundary conditions Under drag, every released pair comes round and meets. One cylinder's centre relative to the other's, the stream from left to right and folded into one quadrant, for pairs released from rest six radii apart under a drag coefficient of one. Released at 10° and 20° from tandem they first drift apart, as the ideal pair would, but the drag takes their speed; the torque keeps turning them, and once past 45° they close. The farthest any gets is 9.55 radii. The two faint paths are ideal pairs released at 10° and 35°, which part for good.

Drag makes every free pair meet

Two cylinders set free in an ideal stream swing towards side by side like a pendulum, and whether they collide or part is fixed, far apart, by forty-five degrees. Give each a drag on its motion relative to the stream and the pendulum stops swinging — but it does not stop the pair. A drag coefficient of order one turns the swing into a creep, lets no pair get far from where it started, and brings every one of them round to meet near side by side.

inviscid · Dalembert A wake throws a following cylinder out to the side, and the pair still meets. One cylinder's centre relative to the other's, the stream from left to right, for pairs released six radii apart at 2°, 5°, 10° and 20° from tandem at Re = 200. Without wakes (faint) the near-tandem pairs drift apart, out to 13 radii, before the drag lets the turn bring them in. With wakes the follower first drafts in, is thrown sideways out of the leader's wake, and never gets beyond 6.26 radii. Every pair touches, near side by side.

A trailing wake hurries a pair together

Two cylinders free in a stream and damped by their drag always end up meeting near side by side, and the obvious candidate for what holds real pairs apart is their wakes: a body beside another's wake is pushed towards the faster fluid, away from it. Give each cylinder a wake that carries its drag and the push is there — but it points the wrong way. It throws a following cylinder out of the leader's wake and round towards side by side, where neither is in the other's wake and nothing opposes the stream's pull. Near tandem the wakes make the pair meet seven to sixty times sooner, and the only balance they create is a saddle.

inviscid · Dalembert The drag follows the surfactant load, and a surface pressure of μU pays nearly all of it. How far the drag has climbed from the clean bubble's to the rigid sphere's, against the mean surfactant load over the whole bubble as a surface pressure in units of μU. A load of 0.2 μU makes a 60° cap and a third of the climb; 0.56 a 90° cap and 70 per cent of it; 1 a 120° cap and 94 per cent. The dashed line is the cap's share of the surface for the same caps: the drag runs ahead of the area covered.

A thousandth of a monolayer holds a bubble still

A clean bubble rising slowly through water feels two-thirds of a rigid sphere's drag, and real bubbles almost never do, because surfactant swept to the rear holds the surface still over a cap there. Solving the flow with the cap in it shows how little that takes. The drag runs ahead of the area covered — half-way to rigid with a third of the surface held — and the surfactant needed is set by the viscous stress, not by the surface tension. For a bubble a tenth of a millimetre across, a thousandth of a monolayer, spread as a cap, makes it rise within a few per cent of a solid ball.

viscous · Mobile interface Every ball's best angle is on one curve. The launch angle that carries a ball furthest over level ground, against β, the square of its launch speed measured in terminal speeds. At small β the air does nothing and the answer is 45°. It falls slowly as β grows: 41° at β = 1, 32.6° at 10 and 20.3° at 1000. A shot put sits at β = 0.009 and 44.9°, a golf ball struck without spin at β = 2.39 and 38.1°, a shuttlecock hit at 30 m/s at β = 19.5 and 30.2°.

The terminal speed sets the best launch angle

In a vacuum every ball goes furthest at forty-five degrees. In air the best angle is lower, and it is lower by an amount that depends on one number only: how many times its own terminal speed the ball is launched at. A shot put, a baseball and a shuttlecock are three points on one curve, which falls from 45° to 41° at once and then needs a thousandfold more speed to reach 20°.

applied · Sport ball The same cap costs a rising bubble a quarter of its speed and a migrating one four-fifths. Speed as a fraction of the clean bubble's against the half-angle of a stagnant cap over the rear: for a bubble migrating in a temperature gradient, and for the same bubble rising under its weight. A 90° cap leaves the rising bubble 74 per cent of its speed and the migrating one 21 per cent; a 120° cap, 68 and 4. The rising bubble can only fall to a rigid sphere's two-thirds; the migrating one falls to nothing.

A cap that slows a rising bubble stops a migrating one

Surfactant swept to the back of a bubble holds the surface still there, and for a bubble rising under its weight the worst this can do is turn it into a solid sphere and cost it a third of its speed. A bubble migrating in a temperature gradient has no such floor. Its own surface is the engine, and a cap removes the engine as well as raising the drag. A cap over the cold hemisphere leaves a rising bubble three-quarters of its speed and a migrating one a fifth; a cap of 120° leaves the migrating bubble four per cent. The surfactant it takes is set by the tension difference that drives the migration, and that is tiny.

viscous · Mobile interface With lift in proportion to spin, a drive gains from spin until its launch is level; the measured curves give it a best spin where drives are hit. The longest carry of a 70 m/s drive at each spin rate, its launch angle chosen for that spin, for four pairs of coefficients: lift in proportion to the spin ratio with fixed drag; drag rising with spin; lift growing as its 0.4 power; both measured forms together. The fixed pair peaks near 4,800 rpm, where its best launch reaches level, and drag rising alone near 4,400 rpm; lift saturating alone is still rising at 6,000; with both measured forms the carry peaks at 234.6 m at 2273 rpm and 16.8°.

A drive's best spin falls where players hit it only because lift tires and drag grows

With lift in proportion to spin and drag fixed, a golf drive keeps gaining from backspin until its best launch has fallen to level, near 4,800 rpm, and past a few thousand more the model flies a ball the length of eight football pitches. Give lift and drag the curves wind tunnels measure — lift growing ever more slowly with the spin ratio, drag rising with it — and the best spin moves to near 2,300 rpm at 70 m/s, with a launch well above level, inside the range launch monitors recommend. Either curve alone leaves it at twice that or more. And along a ridge of best launches the carry hardly moves while the angle falls by ten degrees, which is why the launch angle is the softer of the two numbers.

applied · Sport ball Below separation Morison's drag coefficient is a Stokes layer's, and it grows without limit as the motion shrinks. Wang's drag coefficient for a circular cylinder in an attached oscillatory flow against the Keulegan–Carpenter number, for β of 10², 10³, 10⁴ and 10⁵, each drawn up to Hall's onset of the Honji instability. β = 10²: 2.77 at KC = 1, onset at KC 1.83; β = 10³: 0.845 at KC = 1, onset at KC 1.03; β = 10⁴: 0.264 at KC = 1, onset at KC 0.578; β = 10⁵: 0.0831 at KC = 1, onset at KC 0.325. At fixed β the coefficient falls as 1/KC.

Below separation a cylinder's drag is a Stokes layer, and KC stops deciding the force

Morison's equation splits the force on a cylinder in an oscillating flow into inertia and drag, and the Keulegan–Carpenter number says which dominates — once the flow separates and leaves a wake. Below that, nothing separates, and the drag term describes the thin oscillating boundary layer on the cylinder's surface. Its coefficient then grows without limit as the motion shrinks, as one over the Keulegan–Carpenter number, and that exactly cancels the number's power to decide anything: the drag's share of the force is fixed by the frequency parameter alone, a few per cent at most, until Honji's instability ends the regime.

regimes · Keulegan–Carpenter number A strike cannot choose its spin and launch apart: each angle of attack is one line across the plane, and only an upward one reaches low spin with height. Backspin and launch angle of the ball as the dynamic loft is changed from 1° to 24° above the angle of attack, for a 45 m/s head striking at angles of attack of −4°, 0°, +4° and +8°; on each line, the loft that gives the longest total. At −4° the best is 2413 rpm at 4.43°; at 0° the best is 2129 rpm at 7.43°; at +4° the best is 1636 rpm at 9.71°; at +8° the best is 1221 rpm at 12.3°. The free plane's best for a 66.6 m/s ball is 1349 rpm at 12.5°.

A driver reaches the best drive only by striking upward

The longest drive asks for a launch near twelve degrees with little more than a thousand revolutions a minute of backspin, and a club cannot ask for those separately. Its strike sets the spin by the angle between the head's path and its face, and the launch by the face's loft, so a player who swings level can trade spin for launch only along one line — and that line misses the best drive. Striking upward moves the line. At a 45 m/s head speed the longest total comes at an attack of nine degrees upward with fourteen of loft, 4.6 metres past the best level strike, and it still lands near thirty-five degrees.

applied · Sport ball

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Model limitAdded massBoundary conditiond'Alembert's paradoxMeasurementPotential flowReynolds numberBubbleDimensional analysisDissipationOptimisationScaling

All concepts