Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Pressure gradient — where it appears

The rate at which pressure changes along the flow, which accelerates or decelerates the fluid near a wall. Its sign decides whether a boundary layer thickens or thins, and its integral decides whether the layer survives to the trailing edge.

Named by 8 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Every curved streamline has a pressure gradient across it. Twelve points in the flow past a cylinder, with the arrow at each showing the pressure gradient across the streamline. It points away from the centre of curvature everywhere, and its size is ρq²κ: the fluid is being pushed round a bend, and something has to do the pushing. Both sides are computed here and they share no arithmetic — one is Bernoulli's pressure differenced across the flow, the other is the turning rate of the velocity direction along it — and they agree to 6.7e-5. This is the whole content of the effect usually named after Coandă, and it is happening on every curved streamline of every flow.

The effect that explains nothing

A jet follows a curved wall and the wall feels a suction. Both are real, both are famous, and naming them after Coandă explains neither — what is happening is the normal component of Euler's equation, and it holds on every curved streamline in every flow.

misconceptions · Coanda The pressure, relaxed rather than quoted. The pressure field round a cylinder, obtained by relaxing ∇²p = −ρ∇·(u·∇u) on a body-fitted polar lattice with the exact pressure on the surface and on a far circle. The interior was told nothing except the velocity gradients. It agrees with Bernoulli's closed form everywhere to under two parts in ten thousand of the dynamic pressure, which is the strongest statement this site can make that the elliptic equation is the pressure's own.

Pressure has no speed

Take the divergence of the momentum equation for an incompressible flow and the time derivative disappears, the viscosity disappears, and what is left is Poisson's equation. Pressure is not carried anywhere: it is whatever satisfies an elliptic equation everywhere at once, and that is a statement about a fluid nobody has.

inviscid · Pressure The wall makes vorticity at a rate with no viscosity in it. At a stationary wall the momentum equation collapses to ν ∂²u/∂y² = (1/ρ) ∂p/∂x, and the left-hand side is the diffusive flux of vorticity out of the surface. So the pressure gradient along the wall is the vorticity source, and the viscosity that made the no-slip condition necessary has cancelled out of what the condition produces. The curve is that flux across the Falkner–Skan family, computed from profiles solved by shooting and differenced at the wall; the straight line is the pressure gradient each of those flows has. They agree to 2.3e-14. At zero pressure gradient the flux is exactly zero: a flat plate creates no vorticity at all after its leading edge, and everything in its layer arrived from there.

Where vorticity comes from

Every scrap of vorticity in a flow past a body entered through its surface, and the rate at which it enters contains no viscosity at all — it is the pressure gradient along the wall. A flat plate makes none, and a closed body makes exactly as much of each sign.

kinematics · Vorticity Two profiles, and they are the same profile. The chordwise and spanwise velocity profiles in the boundary layer of a yawed flat plate, each as a fraction of its own edge velocity. They are computed by different code — the chordwise one by shooting a third-order nonlinear equation, the spanwise one by a single pass through a linear second-order one — and they agree to 2.1e-8 over the whole layer. They are the same function of η, because the two equations reduce to the same equation. A swept flat plate has no crossflow at any sweep angle, and that is the independence principle in the only form that has no wriggle room in it.

The wind a swept wing feels

Sweeping a wing back is usually justified by saying it meets a slower wind. It does not meet a slower wind. The equations split exactly in two, and the flow along the span is a passenger that exerts no force and changes nothing — until a pressure gradient breaks the split, and then it becomes the reason a swept wing is a different problem rather than a harder one.

circulation · Sweep Where the suction on a cylinder is actually made. The share of the surface's pressure deficit generated within a given distance of it. Twelve per cent comes from the first twentieth of a radius, half from within a third, and a tenth of it from beyond one and a half radii. There is no thin layer doing the work: the suction is made by the curvature of the whole outer field.

The effect that is real, and where it stops

The Coandă effect has a genuine mechanism, and it is the same equation that makes the suction on a wing. What separates the two is where the integral comes from: a wall jet generates all of its pressure deficit inside a layer two per cent of the radius thick, and a cylinder in a stream needs a third of a radius for half of it.

misconceptions · Coanda The error in the balance is the number itself. The fractional error in the geostrophic wind, against the Rossby number, on logarithmic axes. It is a straight line of slope one through the origin, and that is not an approximation: keeping the centripetal term gives V_g/V = 1 ± Ro exactly, so the error and the number are the same quantity. The geostrophic wind is one per cent right at Ro = 0.01 and a hundred per cent wrong at Ro = 1, which is the value the number is named for and is quoted as the boundary of the approximation.

The balance that is its own error

Geostrophic balance is licensed by the Rossby number being small, and the fractional error in the geostrophic wind is the Rossby number — exactly, not approximately. So the balance everybody uses at Ro of order one is a hundred per cent wrong, and the same quadratic has a hard limit at a quarter that no anticyclone can pass.

regimes · Geostrophy The wall the outer flow is really solving for. A flat plate, the edge of its boundary layer, and the line the outer flow behaves as though the plate were on. The displacement thickness is the mass deficit divided by ρU — checked here against the profile's own integral rather than quoted — and moving the wall out by that much reproduces exactly the flow rate the viscous layer lets past. It is a third of the visible thickness of the layer and it is the only part of the layer the outer problem knows about.

The body the outer flow actually sees

A boundary layer lets less fluid past than an inviscid one would. The outer flow can be given exactly the same reduced flow rate by leaving the fluid inviscid and moving the wall out — so the potential flow that matters is not the flow past the body, but the flow past the body plus a thickness the boundary layer computes.

inviscid · Interaction Two external flows that agree where it matters and nowhere else. The velocity just outside the boundary layer, for two pressure distributions, against distance along the surface. They cross at the half-way station with the same value and the same gradient, and they have nothing else in common: one accelerates steadily and the other does most of its accelerating at once.

A layer that is an integral of everything upstream

Two surfaces are given external velocity distributions that agree exactly at one station — the same speed and the same gradient. The boundary layers there differ by 38 per cent in momentum thickness, and the two surfaces separate five per cent of their length apart.

viscous · Boundary layer

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Boundary layerBernoulli's equationSeparationBlasiusBoundary conditionCoandaEntrainmentFalkner–SkanMeasurementMisconceptionModel limitMomentum theorem

All concepts