Fluid Flow & Aerodynamics
why things fly, and why the usual explanation is wrong
Concept

Streamline curvature — where it appears

The bending of streamlines, which in any flow requires a pressure gradient across them of ρq²/R to turn the fluid's momentum. It is why pressure is lower on the inside of a bend and at the centre of a vortex, and it is the mechanism usually named the Coandă effect.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Every curved streamline has a pressure gradient across it. Twelve points in the flow past a cylinder, with the arrow at each showing the pressure gradient across the streamline. It points away from the centre of curvature everywhere, and its size is ρq²κ: the fluid is being pushed round a bend, and something has to do the pushing. Both sides are computed here and they share no arithmetic — one is Bernoulli's pressure differenced across the flow, the other is the turning rate of the velocity direction along it — and they agree to 6.7e-5. This is the whole content of the effect usually named after Coandă, and it is happening on every curved streamline of every flow.

The effect that explains nothing

A jet follows a curved wall and the wall feels a suction. Both are real, both are famous, and naming them after Coandă explains neither — what is happening is the normal component of Euler's equation, and it holds on every curved streamline in every flow.

misconceptions · Coanda A water sheet two millimetres thick leaves the lip above 0.270 m/s. The effective tension of a sheet of water, 2σ − ρU²h per metre of its width, against the speed it is poured at, for sheets one, two and four millimetres thick. At rest every sheet carries the tension of its two surfaces, 145.4 mN/m, and the momentum it carries along itself subtracts from that. A 1 mm sheet reaches zero at 0.382 m/s, a 2 mm sheet reaches zero at 0.270 m/s and a 4 mm sheet reaches zero at 0.191 m/s. Below its own crossing a sheet bent round a lip is pulled onto it; above, it is flung off. The quantity that decides is a tension, not a pressure, and the speed at which it vanishes is the speed of waves along the sheet.

The teapot effect is a tension, not a pressure

A slow pour runs back under a spout and down its outside, and the name it is usually given is the Coandă effect. The Coandă effect borrows the ambient pressure, and a liquid in air has none to borrow. A liquid sheet is held to a lip by its own surface tension, and it lets go at the one speed that tension cannot carry — the speed of waves along the sheet — whatever the lip's radius.

misconceptions · Coanda The depth at the edge, against how much pressure is left there. The brink depth as a fraction of the critical depth, against the share of the hydrostatic pressure the brink is taken to retain. A free jet — no pressure at all — gives exactly two thirds, to 1e-16. The measured ratio of 0.715 is met at 40 per cent of hydrostatic, which is more residual pressure than a falling nappe looks as though it should have.

The depth at the edge is not the critical one

Every open-channel calculation assumes the pressure is hydrostatic, and usually says so nowhere. At a free overfall it is not, the assumption's failure can be measured, and the measurement is one number — a brink depth that is 0.715 of the critical depth where a hydrostatic reading would make it one.

applied · Open-channel The Earth turns a straight river into a very gentle bend. The transverse circulation through the depth of a straight river running at 1.2 m/s at latitude 50°N, in thousandths of the main flow, against height above the bed — and the circulation of the same river without rotation but bent to the left with a radius of 2V/f, 21 kilometres. The two nearly coincide: the Earth's rotation pushes the fast surface water right and the slow bed water left, exactly as a bend does, and for a river it is a bend of about twenty kilometres' radius everywhere at once.

The Earth bends every river a little

In 1860 Karl Ernst von Baer claimed that the Earth's rotation makes rivers in the northern hemisphere cut into their right banks. The Coriolis force on a river does drive a helix that throws surface water towards the right bank, the same helix a bend drives. For a mountain stream it is a ten-thousandth of what the stream's own bends do. For the great slow rivers of the far north it is a fifth to two-fifths, and there Baer's claim is not absurd.

misconceptions · Coriolis scale The Earth moves the whole train to the right. The centreline of a river like the lower Ob, in its own widths, flowing left to right with its right bank below: now, and 100 years later with and without the Earth's rotation. In that time the bends grow and move 0.77 widths downstream, identically in both. The Earth adds only a steady shift towards the right bank, 0.39 widths a century — the bend migration rate times the Earth's 39% share of the helix.

A river drifts right, and only a reach can show it

Add the Earth's rotation to the law by which a meandering river migrates and it changes nothing about the meanders: they grow and travel downstream exactly as before. It adds one thing, a steady sideways drift of the whole river towards its right bank, at the bend migration rate times the Earth's share of the helix — four-tenths of a width a century on the lower Ob. No single bend can show it, because each bend moves several times further on its own. A survey of about ten to twenty bends can.

misconceptions · Coriolis scale

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

MisconceptionModel limitMomentum theoremCoandaCoriolisMeasurementPressure gradientRegimeRossby numberRotating frameScalingWall jet

All concepts